Glecirasib plus sitneprotafib in patients with KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer in China: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2a trial.
[BACKGROUND] Monotherapy with KRAS (ie, KRAS Gly12Cys) inhibitors has emerged as a mainstream treatment for patients with KRAS -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- 95% CI 61-79
APA
Zhong J, Zhao J, et al. (2026). Glecirasib plus sitneprotafib in patients with KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer in China: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2a trial.. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 14(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00258-9
MLA
Zhong J, et al.. "Glecirasib plus sitneprotafib in patients with KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer in China: an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2a trial.." The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, 2026, pp. 163-173.
PMID
41325755
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Monotherapy with KRAS (ie, KRAS Gly12Cys) inhibitors has emerged as a mainstream treatment for patients with KRAS -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Synergistic effects have been observed with the combination of a KRAS inhibitor and a SHP2 inhibitor in multiple xenograft models. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the KRAS inhibitor glecirasib combined with the SHP2 inhibitor sitneprotafib (JAB-3312; Jacobio Pharmaceuticals, Beijing, China) in patients with KRAS -mutated solid tumours.
[METHODS] We conducted an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2a trial at 26 hospitals across China. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours harbouring a KRAS mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST; version 1.1) were eligible for inclusion in both phases. Patients received oral glecirasib (400 mg or 800 mg once daily) in combination with oral sitneprotafib (2 mg or 3 mg once daily) in seven cohorts evaluating various dose levels and schedules of the two drugs. In phase 1, the primary endpoint was safety assessed by investigators according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) from first treatment dose to 30 days after the last dose of both agents. In phase 2a, the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) between baseline and disease progression or initiation of anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first, based on the comprehensive assessment of all tumour evaluations by investigators following RECIST (version 1.1). All patients who received at least one dose of combination therapy were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05288205) and is currently recruiting.
[FINDINGS] Between May 7, 2022, and Aug 20, 2024, a total of 194 patients with advanced solid tumours were enrolled, of whom 171 (88%) had NSCLC (50 [29%] in phase 1 and 121 [71%] in phase 2a). Median participant age was 65 years (IQR 59-70); 140 (82%) were men and 31 (18%) were women. At data cutoff on Aug 20, 2024, the median follow-up duration was 14·5 months (IQR 11·9-17·1), and 106 (62%) patients had discontinued treatment. Phase 1 concluded with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 pneumonitis) at the highest dose level (glecirasib 800 mg plus sitneprotafib 3 mg once daily, 1 week on and 1 week off); no DLTs were observed at other dose levels. Across phase 1 and 2a, 167 patients (98%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event, which were grade 3-4 in 78 (46%) patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (occurring in ≥20% of all 171 patients) were anaemia (105 [61%]), hypertriglyceridaemia (103 [60%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase (95 [56%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (83 [49%]), increased blood bilirubin (78 [46%]), oedema (62 [36%]), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (60 [35%]), neutropenia (54 [32%]), decreased white blood cell count (50 [29%]), and increased bodyweight (44 [26%]). Three (2%) patients discontinued glecirasib and sitneprotafib due to treatment-related adverse events. No grade 5 treatment-related adverse event was reported. The ORR was 71% (72 patients [95% CI 61-79]) in the subgroup of 102 patients with previously untreated NSCLC; 49% (19 patients [32-65]) in the 39 patients previously treated with systemic therapy but naive to KRAS inhibitors; and 10% (three patients [2-27]) in the 30 patients previously treated with KRAS inhibitor therapy.
[INTERPRETATION] Glecirasib combined with sitneprotafib showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with advanced KRAS -mutated NSCLC, particularly among those who had not received previous treatment. These findings support the evaluation of this combination in a phase 3 trial comparing this chemotherapy-free regimen to current standard of care in this patient group.
[FUNDING] Jacobio Pharmaceuticals.
[TRANSLATION] For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
[METHODS] We conducted an open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1/2a trial at 26 hospitals across China. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours harbouring a KRAS mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST; version 1.1) were eligible for inclusion in both phases. Patients received oral glecirasib (400 mg or 800 mg once daily) in combination with oral sitneprotafib (2 mg or 3 mg once daily) in seven cohorts evaluating various dose levels and schedules of the two drugs. In phase 1, the primary endpoint was safety assessed by investigators according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) from first treatment dose to 30 days after the last dose of both agents. In phase 2a, the primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) between baseline and disease progression or initiation of anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first, based on the comprehensive assessment of all tumour evaluations by investigators following RECIST (version 1.1). All patients who received at least one dose of combination therapy were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05288205) and is currently recruiting.
[FINDINGS] Between May 7, 2022, and Aug 20, 2024, a total of 194 patients with advanced solid tumours were enrolled, of whom 171 (88%) had NSCLC (50 [29%] in phase 1 and 121 [71%] in phase 2a). Median participant age was 65 years (IQR 59-70); 140 (82%) were men and 31 (18%) were women. At data cutoff on Aug 20, 2024, the median follow-up duration was 14·5 months (IQR 11·9-17·1), and 106 (62%) patients had discontinued treatment. Phase 1 concluded with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 pneumonitis) at the highest dose level (glecirasib 800 mg plus sitneprotafib 3 mg once daily, 1 week on and 1 week off); no DLTs were observed at other dose levels. Across phase 1 and 2a, 167 patients (98%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event, which were grade 3-4 in 78 (46%) patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (occurring in ≥20% of all 171 patients) were anaemia (105 [61%]), hypertriglyceridaemia (103 [60%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase (95 [56%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (83 [49%]), increased blood bilirubin (78 [46%]), oedema (62 [36%]), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (60 [35%]), neutropenia (54 [32%]), decreased white blood cell count (50 [29%]), and increased bodyweight (44 [26%]). Three (2%) patients discontinued glecirasib and sitneprotafib due to treatment-related adverse events. No grade 5 treatment-related adverse event was reported. The ORR was 71% (72 patients [95% CI 61-79]) in the subgroup of 102 patients with previously untreated NSCLC; 49% (19 patients [32-65]) in the 39 patients previously treated with systemic therapy but naive to KRAS inhibitors; and 10% (three patients [2-27]) in the 30 patients previously treated with KRAS inhibitor therapy.
[INTERPRETATION] Glecirasib combined with sitneprotafib showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in patients with advanced KRAS -mutated NSCLC, particularly among those who had not received previous treatment. These findings support the evaluation of this combination in a phase 3 trial comparing this chemotherapy-free regimen to current standard of care in this patient group.
[FUNDING] Jacobio Pharmaceuticals.
[TRANSLATION] For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Male; Female; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Aged; China; Mutation; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Adult
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Interleukin-11: A pivotal player and potential therapeutic target in prostate cancer.
- A Soft Matrix Microenvironment Promotes Laterally Spreading Tumors via Oxidative Phosphorylation-Dependent Cell Adhesion.
- Reirradiation Options for Previously Irradiated Prostate Cancer: Is It Feasible to Randomise Between Treatment With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Versus High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy?
- Zonal origin combined with IVIM parameters could predict ISUP risk groups of prostate cancer.
- Comment on "Multimodal radiopathomics approach for predictions of prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients with gastric cancer: a multicohort retrospective study".