Benmelstobart plus anlotinib versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CAMPASS): a blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

[BACKGROUND] PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have been shown to synergise with anti-angiogenic agents in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare benmelstobart plus anlotinib with pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated, driver gene-negative, PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC.

[METHODS] The blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 3 CAMPASS trial was conducted in 79 centres across China. Patients aged 18-75 years with stage IIIB-IV squamous or non-squamous NSCLC, no previous systemic treatment for advanced, recurrent or metastatic diseases, a PD-L1 tumour proportion score of 1% or greater, a life expectancy of 3 months or longer, at least one measurable lesion, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive intravenous benmelstobart (1200 mg once on day 1) plus oral anlotinib (12 mg daily on days 1-14) or intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg once on day 1) plus placebo every 3 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally and stratified by tumour histology, PD-L1 tumour proportion score, and brain metastases. Treatment allocation was open label for investigators and masked to patients and statisticians. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by a blinded independent review committee per Response Evalutation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least dose of study drug. Results reported here are from a preplanned final analysis for progression-free survival. This ongoing study is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04964479.

[FINDINGS] Between Aug 6, 2021, and Dec 14, 2022, 531 patients were randomly assigned (354 to the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group and 177 to the pembrolizumab plus placebo group). 449 (85%) patients were male, 82 (15%) were female, and 493 (93%) were of Han ethnicity. Two patients in the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group and one patients in the pembrolizumab plus placebo group were untreated and therefore excluded from the safety population. After a median follow-up of 11·4 months (95% CI 9·4-13·1) for the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group and 10·6 months (9·0-13·0) for the pembrolizumab plus placebo group, median progression-free survival was 11·0 months (9·2-12·6) and 7·1 months (5·8-9·5), respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·90]; log-rank p=0·0057). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 206 (59%) of 352 patients in the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group and 51 (29%) of 176 patients in the pembrolizumab plus placebo group, and the most frequent one was hypertension (90 [26%] vs five [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 89 (25%) patients in the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group and 37 (21%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus placebo group, the most common of which were haemoptysis (nine [3%] vs none) and immune-mediated pulmonary diseases (eight [2%] vs five [3%]). Five (1%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the benmelstobart plus anlotinib group (two due to haemoptysis and one each due to immune-mediated pulmonary disease, disease progression, and infection pneumonia) and four (2%) occurred in the pembrolizumab plus placebo group (one each due to respiratory failure, pulmonary inflammation, disease progression, and myocardial injury).

[INTERPRETATION] Benmelstobart plus anlotinib showed longer progression-free survival than pembrolizumab plus placebo and no unexpected safety signals were reported, suggesting benmelstobart plus anlotinib as a potential first-line option in driver gene-negative, PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC. Longer term follow-up is needed to establish effects on overall survival.

[FUNDING] Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group.