본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Invasive breast carcinoma with a DCIS-like growth pattern: Clinicopathological features and diagnostic pitfalls.

Pathology, research and practice 2026 Vol.282() p. 156460

Xu X, Zhang Y, Fang H, Li C, Xu X, Jiang H, Yang L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-like invasive carcinoma is a rare morphologic pattern of expansile invasive breast cancer that is frequently misdiagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 추적기간 13 months

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. (2026). Invasive breast carcinoma with a DCIS-like growth pattern: Clinicopathological features and diagnostic pitfalls.. Pathology, research and practice, 282, 156460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2026.156460
MLA Xu X, et al.. "Invasive breast carcinoma with a DCIS-like growth pattern: Clinicopathological features and diagnostic pitfalls.." Pathology, research and practice, vol. 282, 2026, pp. 156460.
PMID 41921235

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-like invasive carcinoma is a rare morphologic pattern of expansile invasive breast cancer that is frequently misdiagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ. However, some patients develop lymph node metastases exhibiting DCIS-like features, and there is limited literature documenting its clinicopathological characteristics. To characterize the clinicopathological features, immunophenotype, and diagnostic pitfalls of breast invasive carcinoma with a DCIS-like growth pattern (DCIS-like invasive carcinoma), a retrospective review of 319 breast carcinomas (January 2021-September 2025) identified 11 cases of DCIS-like invasive carcinoma. Clinical, histopathological, and immunophenotypic features were evaluated, and interobserver concordance for myoepithelial and basement membrane markers was assessed by 12 pathologists. Three cases (3/11, 27.27%) showed pure DCIS-like invasive carcinoma, and 8 (8/11,72.73%) were admixed with invasive carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Growth patterns included cribriform, papillary, solid, and comedo and micropapillary. All tumors lacked myoepithelial marker expression (CK5/6, p63, CK14, SMA, Calponin), with Collagen IV confirming basement membrane loss; CK5/6 and CK14 showed high interobserver agreement (κ=1.00). Four patients developed axillary lymph node metastases in which the metastatic foci paradoxically retained DCIS-like morphology, directly confirming their invasive nature. Hormone receptor positivity was observed in 7(7/11,63.64%) tumors, HER2 overexpression in 2(2/11,18.18%) and the Ki-67 index ranged from 5 to 90%. With a mean follow-up of 13 months (range, 2-51 months), no local recurrence or distant metastasis was documented in 10 patients, DCIS-like morphology was identified in cervical lymph node metastasis in one patient at 51 months postoperatively. DCIS-like invasive carcinoma is a rare and underrecognized morphologic pattern that closely mimics DCIS and poses significant diagnostic challenges. The presence of lymph node metastases with DCIS-like morphology underscores its invasive potential. Accurate recognition requires careful morphological assessment in combination with multiple myoepithelial markers to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate clinical management.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)