Development of an evaluation index system for assessing the information support effect on patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
1/5 보강
[INTRODUCTION] Delivering comprehensive information support is essential for the successful completion of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.
- p-value P < 0.01
APA
Chen X, Wang Z, et al. (2026). Development of an evaluation index system for assessing the information support effect on patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.. Applied nursing research : ANR, 88, 152049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2026.152049
MLA
Chen X, et al.. "Development of an evaluation index system for assessing the information support effect on patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.." Applied nursing research : ANR, vol. 88, 2026, pp. 152049.
PMID
41826027 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Delivering comprehensive information support is essential for the successful completion of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. The absence of a standardized tool to evaluate the effectiveness of this support currently limits the precision of clinical interventions.
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to develop a comprehensive indicator system for evaluating the efficacy of information support provided to breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
[METHODS] Guided by the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) model, a multi-disciplinary team conducted this study from March to August 2024. A mixed-methods approach was adopted. First, a preliminary item pool was developed through a literature review and semi-structured interviews. The items were subsequently screened and refined via a two-round Delphi expert consultation. Finally, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the weight of each indicator.
[RESULTS] The effective response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 88.9% and 100%, with authoritative coefficients of 0.932 and 0.943, respectively. Kendall's W coefficients for all tiers of indicators ranged from 0.244 to 0.365 in the first round and 0.313 to 0.459 in the second round (all P < 0.01), demonstrating a high degree of expert consensus and authority. The final evaluation system comprises 3 first-level, 14 second-level, and 51 third-level indicators. These indicators are organized into three core dimensions: Health Knowledge (e.g., radiotherapy basics, medication, complication management), Health Attitude (e.g., perception, health motivation), and Health Practice (e.g., symptom management, nutritional management, treatment adherence), systematically capturing the patient's progression from knowledge acquisition to belief internalization and behavioral change.
[CONCLUSION] The developed indicator system is scientifically sound and practical. It provides a valuable tool for clinicians to systematically assess the effectiveness of information support and to formulate personalized health guidance plans for breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to develop a comprehensive indicator system for evaluating the efficacy of information support provided to breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
[METHODS] Guided by the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) model, a multi-disciplinary team conducted this study from March to August 2024. A mixed-methods approach was adopted. First, a preliminary item pool was developed through a literature review and semi-structured interviews. The items were subsequently screened and refined via a two-round Delphi expert consultation. Finally, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the weight of each indicator.
[RESULTS] The effective response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 88.9% and 100%, with authoritative coefficients of 0.932 and 0.943, respectively. Kendall's W coefficients for all tiers of indicators ranged from 0.244 to 0.365 in the first round and 0.313 to 0.459 in the second round (all P < 0.01), demonstrating a high degree of expert consensus and authority. The final evaluation system comprises 3 first-level, 14 second-level, and 51 third-level indicators. These indicators are organized into three core dimensions: Health Knowledge (e.g., radiotherapy basics, medication, complication management), Health Attitude (e.g., perception, health motivation), and Health Practice (e.g., symptom management, nutritional management, treatment adherence), systematically capturing the patient's progression from knowledge acquisition to belief internalization and behavioral change.
[CONCLUSION] The developed indicator system is scientifically sound and practical. It provides a valuable tool for clinicians to systematically assess the effectiveness of information support and to formulate personalized health guidance plans for breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Rare fusion transcript in a refractory adult T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.
- Rabdosin B suppresses proliferation of nonsmall cell lung cancer by regulating the SRC/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
- Development of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for proGRP in human serum.
- Genetically encoded biosensors in microbes for Tumor targeting.
- Analysis of discordant results in multi-technique platform-based MRD detection in multiple myeloma and the clinical decision-making dilemma.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.