본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of biparameter and multiparameter MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer across PSA stratifications.

1/5 보강
BMC medical imaging 📖 저널 OA 100% 2022: 3/3 OA 2023: 2/2 OA 2024: 3/3 OA 2025: 37/37 OA 2026: 44/44 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.25(1) p. 346
Retraction 확인
출처

Jin P, Ding Z, Huang F, Li K, Liu Y, Song G

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The comparative diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) continues to be debated.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < 0.001
  • Sensitivity 91.6%
  • Specificity 91.0%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Jin P, Ding Z, et al. (2025). Comparison of biparameter and multiparameter MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer across PSA stratifications.. BMC medical imaging, 25(1), 346. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01884-x
MLA Jin P, et al.. "Comparison of biparameter and multiparameter MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer across PSA stratifications.." BMC medical imaging, vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, pp. 346.
PMID 40855538 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The comparative diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) versus multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) continues to be debated. This study aimed to compare mpMRI and bpMRI in detecting csPCa across prostate-specific antigen (PSA) strata and identify supplementary tools comparable to dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging.

[METHODS] Images were evaluated using mpMRI-based mp-PI-RADS and bpMRI-based bp-PI-RADS and simplified PI-RADS (S-PI-RADS) schemes. The lesion volume (LV) was manually segmented by a radiologist using ITK-SNAP software on high b-value DWI images. The diagnostic performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The differences of T2WI-score, DCE assessment and LV between csPCa and non-csPCa in peripheral zone (PZ) with DWI category 3 were compared.

[RESULTS] For overall PSA, mp-PI-RADS and bp-PI-RADS showed comparable AUCs (0.889 vs. 0.882; P > 0.05). When PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, mp-PI-RADS exhibited the highest specificity (91.0% vs. bp-PI-RADS: 64.4%, S-PI-RADS: 75.0%) and PPV (73.0% vs. bp-PI-RADS: 47.7%, S-PI-RADS: 52.5%). When PSA > 10 ng/ml, S-PI-RADS demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.6% vs. mp-PI-RADS: 83.2%, bp-PI-RADS: 81.2%) and F1-score (0.873 [0.822-0.924] vs. mp-PI-RADS: 0.832 [0.778-0.886], bp-PI-RADS: 0.831 [0.777-0.885]). Among DWI category 3 PZ lesions, neither DCE nor T2WI significantly stratified csPCa risk (P = 0.657 and P = 0.424), whereas LV ≥ 0.5 cm³ showed markedly higher csPCa risk (83.8% vs. 45.8%; P < 0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] While mpMRI and bpMRI exhibit comparable overall diagnostic performance but context-dependent strengths: mpMRI demonstrates higher specificity for avoiding unnecessary biopsies when PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, whereas bpMRI (particularly S-PI-RADS) maximizes sensitivity for csPCa detection when PSA > 10 ng/ml. LV is anticipated to serve as a complementary radiological biomarker at the absence of DCE.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기