본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Best Systemic Therapy With or Without Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The RAMPP Randomised Controlled Trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
European urology 📖 저널 OA 5.7% 2021: 0/2 OA 2022: 0/2 OA 2023: 0/1 OA 2025: 5/89 OA 2026: 4/78 OA 2021~2026 2025
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
132 patients were randomised.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] While this trial has substantial limitations, the results support addition of RP as local therapy to BST in omPC. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02454543.

Graefen M, Falkenbach F, Maurer T, Budäus L, Tilki D, Karakiewicz PI

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Our aim was to evaluate the effect of addition of radical prostatectomy (RP) to best systemic therapy (BST) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with oligometastat

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.037
  • p-value p = 0.045

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Graefen M, Falkenbach F, et al. (2025). Best Systemic Therapy With or Without Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The RAMPP Randomised Controlled Trial.. European urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4144
MLA Graefen M, et al.. "Best Systemic Therapy With or Without Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The RAMPP Randomised Controlled Trial.." European urology, 2025.
PMID 41046179 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Our aim was to evaluate the effect of addition of radical prostatectomy (RP) to best systemic therapy (BST) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC).

[METHODS] This randomised controlled trial included patients with omPC with a low metastatic burden (1-5 bone metastases with/without nodal involvement) on conventional or PET imaging. Patients were randomised to receive either RP with pelvic lymph-node dissection plus BST (RP + BST) or BST alone. The primary endpoint was CSM. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression and overall survival (OS). Study accrual was stopped early because of a change in medical practice. Statistical analyses included cumulative incidence plots, Gray's test, competing-risks regression, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and log-rank tests.

[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Between May 2015 and December 2018, 132 patients were randomised. The median age was 67 yr (interquartile range 63-71) and median prostate-specific antigen was 20 ng/ml (interquartile range 10-39). The 5-yr CSM cumulative incidence was 13% for RP + BST and 23% for BST alone (p = 0.037), with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.16-0.98; p = 0.045). The 5-yr cumulative incidence of clinical progression including CSM was 59% for RP + BST and 60% for BST alone. The 5-yr OS rate was 81% for RP + BST and 74% for BST alone. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III surgery-related complications occurred in nine of 66 (14%) patients in the RP + BST arm. Limitations include early discontinuation of study accrual and the lack of statistical significance for the OS benefit.

[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] While this trial has substantial limitations, the results support addition of RP as local therapy to BST in omPC. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02454543.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반