Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy for Patients With Very-high Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in Clinical Stages T2 and T3a.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
49 patients treated between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed; 25 received NCHT consisting of androgen deprivation therapy and estramustine phosphate, while 24 underwent radical prostatectomy without NCHT.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
NCHT consisting of androgen deprivation therapy and estramustine phosphate, while 24 underwent radical prostatectomy without NCHT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
While cytotoxic therapy combined with androgen deprivation remains of investigational interest, its utility in organ-confined but biologically aggressive prostate cancer appears limited based on current evidence. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to clarify the optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant approaches.
[BACKGROUND/AIM] The impact of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in patients with very-high risk localized prostate cancer remains uncertain, part
- 추적기간 19 months
APA
Kikuchi D, Numakura K, et al. (2026). Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy for Patients With Very-high Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in Clinical Stages T2 and T3a.. In vivo (Athens, Greece), 40(2), 1098-1105. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14264
MLA
Kikuchi D, et al.. "Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy for Patients With Very-high Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in Clinical Stages T2 and T3a.." In vivo (Athens, Greece), vol. 40, no. 2, 2026, pp. 1098-1105.
PMID
41760337 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND/AIM] The impact of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in patients with very-high risk localized prostate cancer remains uncertain, particularly because previous studies have included heterogeneous populations with locally advanced disease. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical significance of NCHT in patients with strictly defined T2-T3a very-high risk disease.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] A total of 49 patients treated between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed; 25 received NCHT consisting of androgen deprivation therapy and estramustine phosphate, while 24 underwent radical prostatectomy without NCHT. All patients received robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection.
[RESULTS] Baseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, with a median follow-up period of 19 months in the NCHT group and 29 months in the non-NCHT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in BRFS between the groups (=0.397). In multivariable Cox analysis, primary Gleason pattern 5 was the only independent predictor of BRFS (hazard ratio=3.72; 95% confidence interval=1.19-11.58), whereas NCHT did not confer an oncological benefit.
[CONCLUSION] These findings suggest that for patients with very-high risk prostate cancer limited to T2-T3a disease, NCHT does not improve biochemical recurrence outcomes, and tumor biology-particularly primary Gleason pattern 5-plays a more decisive role in prognosis than neoadjuvant systemic intensification. While cytotoxic therapy combined with androgen deprivation remains of investigational interest, its utility in organ-confined but biologically aggressive prostate cancer appears limited based on current evidence. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to clarify the optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant approaches.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] A total of 49 patients treated between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed; 25 received NCHT consisting of androgen deprivation therapy and estramustine phosphate, while 24 underwent radical prostatectomy without NCHT. All patients received robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection.
[RESULTS] Baseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups, with a median follow-up period of 19 months in the NCHT group and 29 months in the non-NCHT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in BRFS between the groups (=0.397). In multivariable Cox analysis, primary Gleason pattern 5 was the only independent predictor of BRFS (hazard ratio=3.72; 95% confidence interval=1.19-11.58), whereas NCHT did not confer an oncological benefit.
[CONCLUSION] These findings suggest that for patients with very-high risk prostate cancer limited to T2-T3a disease, NCHT does not improve biochemical recurrence outcomes, and tumor biology-particularly primary Gleason pattern 5-plays a more decisive role in prognosis than neoadjuvant systemic intensification. While cytotoxic therapy combined with androgen deprivation remains of investigational interest, its utility in organ-confined but biologically aggressive prostate cancer appears limited based on current evidence. Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to clarify the optimal patient selection for neoadjuvant approaches.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
- Humans
- Male
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Middle Aged
- Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prostatectomy
- Retrospective Studies
- Neoplasm Grading
- Androgen Antagonists
- Treatment Outcome
- Prognosis
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Localized prostate cancer
- chemohormonal therapy
- neoadjuvant therapy
- robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.