본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prevention of lymphoceles using peritoneal flaps during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
BJUI compass 📖 저널 OA 100% 2024: 1/1 OA 2025: 34/34 OA 2026: 15/15 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.7(3) p. e70126
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
7316 patients were analysed, with 2997 receiving the PF and 4319 receiving the standard technique.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] PF use during RARP with PLND significantly reduces the incidence of lymphoceles and postoperative complications without compromising oncological or perioperative outcomes. These findings support PF use as a safe and effective technique for preventing lymphoceles.

Yildiz H, Adhoni MZU, Byrnes K, Lamb B, Lee DI, Shahait M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] The study aims to assess whether the use of a peritoneal flap (PF) during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) reduces the incidence of ly

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yildiz H, Adhoni MZU, et al. (2026). Prevention of lymphoceles using peritoneal flaps during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. BJUI compass, 7(3), e70126. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70126
MLA Yildiz H, et al.. "Prevention of lymphoceles using peritoneal flaps during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.." BJUI compass, vol. 7, no. 3, 2026, pp. e70126.
PMID 41767912 ↗
DOI 10.1002/bco2.70126

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] The study aims to assess whether the use of a peritoneal flap (PF) during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) reduces the incidence of lymphoceles compared to the standard surgical approach without a flap.

[METHODS] The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251052120). A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Google Scholar was performed up to May 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing PF use with the standard surgical technique without the flap during RARP with PLND. Primary outcomes were symptomatic, asymptomatic, total lymphoceles and lymphoceles requiring intervention. Secondary outcomes included complications, operative time, blood loss, positive surgical margins and hospital stay.

[RESULTS] Fourteen studies (six RCTs, eight observational) including 7316 patients were analysed, with 2997 receiving the PF and 4319 receiving the standard technique. PF use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic, asymptomatic, total lymphoceles and lymphoceles requiring intervention. PF use reduces overall complications without significantly increasing operative time, hospital stay or positive margins. Intraoperative blood loss was slightly lower in the standard group.

[CONCLUSIONS] PF use during RARP with PLND significantly reduces the incidence of lymphoceles and postoperative complications without compromising oncological or perioperative outcomes. These findings support PF use as a safe and effective technique for preventing lymphoceles.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기