본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy and safety of male fertility-sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder versus radical cystectomy and nerve-sparing cystectomy: a meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Frontiers in oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 15/15 OA 2022: 98/98 OA 2023: 60/60 OA 2024: 189/189 OA 2025: 1004/1004 OA 2026: 620/620 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.15() p. 1617812
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1104 patients were incorporated in this study.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
More relevant clinical RCTs are required. [SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024558576.

Huang Y, Shi H, Wang Q, Wang Z, Wang R, Zhang Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Radical cystectomy (RC) serves as the gold standard treatment for organ-localized bladder cancer; however, postoperative complications diminish the quality of life of patients.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P<0.001
  • p-value P = 0.003
  • 95% CI 3.27-49.03
  • OR 12.67
  • 연구 설계 Systematic Review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Huang Y, Shi H, et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of male fertility-sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder versus radical cystectomy and nerve-sparing cystectomy: a meta-analysis.. Frontiers in oncology, 15, 1617812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1617812
MLA Huang Y, et al.. "Efficacy and safety of male fertility-sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder versus radical cystectomy and nerve-sparing cystectomy: a meta-analysis.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 15, 2025, pp. 1617812.
PMID 41244901 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Radical cystectomy (RC) serves as the gold standard treatment for organ-localized bladder cancer; however, postoperative complications diminish the quality of life of patients. Whether male fertility-sparing radical cystectomy(FSRC) with orthotopic neobladder (ONB) surpasses RC and nerve-sparing cystectomy (NSC) remains controversial. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the two surgical approaches.

[METHODS] In accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI databases, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2024. Eligible studies were identified in line with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

[RESULTS] A total of 10 studies encompassing 1104 patients were incorporated in this study. The outcomes demonstrated that fertility-sparing radical cystectomy (FSRC) presented significant superiority in erectile function (EF) (OR: 12.67; 95% CI 3.27-49.03; P<0.001), daytime urinary continence (OR: 5.91; 95% CI, 1.83-19.13; P = 0.003), and nocturnal urinary continence (OR: 5.13; 95% CI, 1.98-13.34; P<0.001) over non-fertility-sparing radical cystectomy (nFSRC). Compared with nFSRC, the incidences of postoperative prostate cancer (RD:-0.10; 95% CI, -0.21-0.10; P = 0.086), tumor local recurrence (OR:0.51; 95% CI, 0.26-1.00; P = 0.052), tumor metastasis (RD:-0.02; 95% CI, -0.09-0.06; P = 0.665) and 2-year survival (OR:1.21; 95% CI, 0.63-2.30; P = 0.567) after surgery were comparable. In the subgroup analysis, some differences in outcome measures were identified based on sample size, study type, control group, and study area.

[CONCLUSION] Under rigorous preoperative screening, male FSRC with ONB demonstrates certain efficacy and safety in the treatment of bladder cancer, particularly among younger patients, warranting broader clinical consideration. More relevant clinical RCTs are required.

[SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024558576.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기