본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Absence of independent prognostic impact of node status in M1 prostate cancer: implications from a SEER-based study.

International urology and nephrology 2026 Vol.58(2) p. 537-543

Li L, Hu Z, Li C, Zhang L, Hu J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] We aimed to evaluate the association between T stage, N stage, and Gleason score with OS in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.033
  • p-value p = 0.015
  • 95% CI 1.21-5.79
  • HR 2.65

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Li L, Hu Z, et al. (2026). Absence of independent prognostic impact of node status in M1 prostate cancer: implications from a SEER-based study.. International urology and nephrology, 58(2), 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04694-w
MLA Li L, et al.. "Absence of independent prognostic impact of node status in M1 prostate cancer: implications from a SEER-based study.." International urology and nephrology, vol. 58, no. 2, 2026, pp. 537-543.
PMID 40715998

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] We aimed to evaluate the association between T stage, N stage, and Gleason score with OS in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients.

[METHODS] Using the SEER database, we identified M1 prostate cancer patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Log-rank testing was performed, stratified by metastatic substages (M1a, M1b, M1c). Multivariable Cox regression models identified independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

[RESULTS] A total of 170 mPCa patients were included, 60.0% had Gleason score ≥ 8, 74.7% presented with T3-T4 disease (versus 25.3% with localized T1-T2 tumors), and metastatic distribution included 68.8% M1b, 17.6% M1a, and 13.5% M1c. M1c patients demonstrated significantly worse prognosis (p = 0.033). Subgroup analyses revealed that advanced T stage significantly correlated with reduced OS in the overall M1 cohort (p = 0.015), M1b (p = 0.018), and M1c subgroups (p = 0.004), but not in M1a (p = 0.226). Nodal status showed no significant association with OS in any subgroup (M1a: p = 0.252; M1b: p = 0.762; M1c: p = 0.616). On multivariable Cox analysis, Gleason score ≥ 8 (HR = 2.65, 95%CI 1.21-5.79, p = 0.014), T4 stage (HR = 3.04, 95%CI 1.17-7.90, p = 0.023), and M1c substage (HR = 6.27, 95%CI 1.61-24.39, p = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of poor survival.

[CONCLUSION] Our study suggests that nodal staging may have limited biological rationale in PCa when synchronous distant metastases exist.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; SEER Program; Prognosis; Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Lymphatic Metastasis; Survival Rate; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Retrospective Studies

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)