Superiority of long axial field-of-view Ga-PSMA-11 PET over short axial field-of-view PET in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparison.
[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] Previous studies have shown that long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT can significantly improve the detection rate compared to short axial field-of-view (SAFOV)
APA
Wang Y, Zhu L, et al. (2026). Superiority of long axial field-of-view Ga-PSMA-11 PET over short axial field-of-view PET in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparison.. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 53(3), 1811-1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07546-y
MLA
Wang Y, et al.. "Superiority of long axial field-of-view Ga-PSMA-11 PET over short axial field-of-view PET in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparison.." European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, vol. 53, no. 3, 2026, pp. 1811-1821.
PMID
41014335
Abstract
[BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE] Previous studies have shown that long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT can significantly improve the detection rate compared to short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer. However, the diagnostic efficiency between the two scans was compared in different cohorts, not directly within the same patients. Whether LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET could improve image quality, enhance lesion quantification, and impact patient treatment decisions in the same patients remains unclear. To address this research gap, we performed a direct comparison of LAFOV and SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET in the same cohort of prostate cancer patients to evaluate whether LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET could enhance lesion identification and modify clinical management compared to SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET.
[METHODS] Thirty-four patients with prostate cancer undergoing routine Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were included and underwent a same-day dual-scanning protocol. Half of the patients first underwent a clinically routine SAFOV PET scan using continuous bed motion, followed immediately by LAFOV PET (5-minute acquisition in list mode); the other half underwent scanning in the reverse order. The image quality of LAFOV and SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET was compared using subjective scoring and objective parameters. Objective parameters, including maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), were measured and compared.
[RESULTS] LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET exhibited superior image quality compared to SAFOV PET based on both subjective and objective parameters. LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET had better image quality and higher lesion SUVmax, SNR, and TBR compared to SAFOV PET. In 17.65% of patients, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected additional lesions that were unidentified on SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET. Compared to SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected additional lesions in 33.33% of patients with biochemical recurrence and 9.09% of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, leading to significant changes in clinical management.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this head-to-head comparison, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated superior image quality, enhanced lesion detection, and a significant impact on clinical management for both biochemical recurrence and newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET. These findings suggest that LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET may be the preferred imaging modality for comprehensive prostate cancer evaluation.
[METHODS] Thirty-four patients with prostate cancer undergoing routine Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were included and underwent a same-day dual-scanning protocol. Half of the patients first underwent a clinically routine SAFOV PET scan using continuous bed motion, followed immediately by LAFOV PET (5-minute acquisition in list mode); the other half underwent scanning in the reverse order. The image quality of LAFOV and SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET was compared using subjective scoring and objective parameters. Objective parameters, including maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), were measured and compared.
[RESULTS] LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET exhibited superior image quality compared to SAFOV PET based on both subjective and objective parameters. LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET had better image quality and higher lesion SUVmax, SNR, and TBR compared to SAFOV PET. In 17.65% of patients, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected additional lesions that were unidentified on SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET. Compared to SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET detected additional lesions in 33.33% of patients with biochemical recurrence and 9.09% of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, leading to significant changes in clinical management.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this head-to-head comparison, LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated superior image quality, enhanced lesion detection, and a significant impact on clinical management for both biochemical recurrence and newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients compared to SAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET. These findings suggest that LAFOV Ga-PSMA-11 PET may be the preferred imaging modality for comprehensive prostate cancer evaluation.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Gallium Radioisotopes; Gallium Isotopes; Aged; Edetic Acid; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Aged, 80 and over
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- "I wanna look like the person in that picture": Linking selfies on social media to cosmetic surgery consideration based on the tripartite influence model.
- ZmSKIP enhances drought tolerance by reducing stomatal aperture in maize.
- c.7374_7375insAlu is a French-Canadian founder pathogenic variant associated with predisposition to pancreatic and breast cancer.
- Enhancing Node-RADS for preoperative assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma: validation and modification.
- Aging modulation of the immune system and immunotherapy efficacy in cancer.