본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

[Retracted] Silencing of GP73 inhibits invasion and metastasis via suppression of epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma.

1/5 보강
Oncology reports 📖 저널 OA 88.8% 2022: 2/2 OA 2024: 5/5 OA 2025: 33/35 OA 2026: 71/75 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.54(3)
Retraction 확인
출처

Yang Y, Liu Q, Zhang H, Zhao H, Mao R, Li Z

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that Fig.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yang Y, Liu Q, et al. (2025). [Retracted] Silencing of GP73 inhibits invasion and metastasis via suppression of epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma.. Oncology reports, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2025.8943
MLA Yang Y, et al.. "[Retracted] Silencing of GP73 inhibits invasion and metastasis via suppression of epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma.." Oncology reports, vol. 54, no. 3, 2025.
PMID 40641115 ↗

Abstract

Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that Fig. 3A (showing the results of scratch‑wound assay experiments) and Fig. 4C (showing the results of cell morphological experiments) both contained internally a pair of data panels containing duplicated data. Moreover, four of the six data panels shown in Fig. 3B (showing the results of Transwell migration assay experiments), contained either matching or overlapping data panels. In addition, the western blot data in Fig. 4A selected to show the Vimentin protein bands for the MHCC97H cell line and the Snail protein bands for the Bel‑7404 cell line were seemingly identical. Finally, it was noted that certain of the western blot data in Fig. 4A of the above paper were also apparently included in Figs. 2A and 3A of another paper published by the same group in the journal . Owing to the number of identified instances of data duplication in this paper, the Editor of has decided that it should be retracted from the Journal on account of a lack of confidence in the presented data. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 37: 1182‑1188, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5351].

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

📖 전문 본문 읽기 PMC JATS · ~2 KB · 영문
Oncol Rep 37: 1182–1188, 2017; DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5351
Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that Fig. 3A (showing the results of scratch-wound assay experiments) and Fig. 4C (showing the results of cell morphological experiments) both contained internally a pair of data panels containing duplicated data. Moreover, four of the six data panels shown in Fig. 3B (showing the results of Transwell migration assay experiments), contained either matching or overlapping data panels. In addition, the western blot data in Fig. 4A selected to show the Vimentin protein bands for the MHCC97H cell line and the Snail protein bands for the Bel-7404 cell line were seemingly identical. Finally, it was noted that certain of the western blot data in Fig. 4A of the above paper were also apparently included in Figs. 2A and 3A of another paper published by the same group in the journal Carcinogenesis.
Owing to the number of identified instances of data duplication in this paper, the Editor of Oncology Reports has decided that it should be retracted from the Journal on account of a lack of confidence in the presented data. The authors were asked for an explanation to account for these concerns, but the Editorial Office did not receive a reply. The Editor apologizes to the readership for any inconvenience caused.

출처: PubMed Central (JATS). 라이선스는 원 publisher 정책을 따릅니다 — 인용 시 원문을 표기해 주세요.

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기