본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: A multicenter real-world data study.

1/5 보강
Surgery today 2025 Vol.55(12) p. 1953-1965
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
938 patients, of whom 936 received extended prophylaxis.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
extended prophylaxis
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Extended prophylaxis may not only be ineffective but also potentially harmful. These findings underscore the importance of adhering to evidence-based guidelines in the prevention of SSI.

Yamada T, Matsuda A, Nishino T, Uehara K, Hagiwara N, Sakurazawa N, Kawano Y, Matsushita A, Shimizu T, Minamimura K, Akatsuka J, Yoshida H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSES] Despite guideline recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics within 24 h postoperatively, extended prophylaxis is sometimes administered in clinical practice, particularly in d

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yamada T, Matsuda A, et al. (2025). Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: A multicenter real-world data study.. Surgery today, 55(12), 1953-1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03101-2
MLA Yamada T, et al.. "Impact of extended prophylactic antibiotic administration on surgical site infections: A multicenter real-world data study.." Surgery today, vol. 55, no. 12, 2025, pp. 1953-1965.
PMID 40682662

Abstract

[PURPOSES] Despite guideline recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics within 24 h postoperatively, extended prophylaxis is sometimes administered in clinical practice, particularly in digestive surgeries with a high risk of surgical site infections (SSI). This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the characteristics of patients receiving extended prophylaxis and its effectiveness in preventing SSI.

[METHODS] Clinical and administrative claims data from three hospitals were analyzed for patients undergoing elective esophageal, gastric, hepatic (with or without biliary reconstruction), pancreatic, colon, or rectal surgery between January 2021 and December 2023. The primary endpoint was SSI, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 occurring within 30 days postoperatively. The incidence of SSI was compared between extended prophylaxis (continued on or after postoperative day 3) and standard prophylaxis.

[RESULTS] This study included 2,938 patients, of whom 936 received extended prophylaxis. Prolonged surgical time was significantly associated with extended prophylaxis across various types of surgery. Extended prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in SSI in most procedures and was linked to a higher incidence of SSI in colon cancer patients.

[CONCLUSION] Extended prophylaxis may not only be ineffective but also potentially harmful. These findings underscore the importance of adhering to evidence-based guidelines in the prevention of SSI.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Incidence; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Time Factors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Aged, 80 and over; Adult

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)