본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparative Toxicovigilance of Capmatinib and Tepotinib in NSCLC: Respiratory Signal Detection and Adverse Event Profiling via FAERS.

1/5 보강
Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology 📖 저널 OA 13.4% 2022: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/2 OA 2025: 4/44 OA 2026: 11/65 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.40(1) p. e70657
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1771 cases for capmatinib and 470 for tepotinib, standardized with MedDRA v26.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
These distinct AE profiles highlight an infection-driven pulmonary risk for tepotinib requiring close monitoring, while capmatinib's association with sensory disorders warrants specific patient management considerations. Our findings underscore the need for individualized safety monitoring based on the unique AE profiles of each MET inhibitor.

Chang X, Shao D, Bao J, Liu Z, Ma J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Capmatinib and tepotinib are selective MET inhibitors for MET exon 14 skipping non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet comprehensive real-world safety profiles, particularly concerning respiratory and

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Chang X, Shao D, et al. (2026). Comparative Toxicovigilance of Capmatinib and Tepotinib in NSCLC: Respiratory Signal Detection and Adverse Event Profiling via FAERS.. Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology, 40(1), e70657. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.70657
MLA Chang X, et al.. "Comparative Toxicovigilance of Capmatinib and Tepotinib in NSCLC: Respiratory Signal Detection and Adverse Event Profiling via FAERS.." Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology, vol. 40, no. 1, 2026, pp. e70657.
PMID 41439364 ↗
DOI 10.1002/jbt.70657

Abstract

Capmatinib and tepotinib are selective MET inhibitors for MET exon 14 skipping non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet comprehensive real-world safety profiles, particularly concerning respiratory and rare adverse events (AEs), remain limited. We conducted a disproportionality analysis of the FDA AE Reporting System (FAERS) database, utilizing four algorithms (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, MGPS) to identify AE signals from 1771 cases for capmatinib and 470 for tepotinib, standardized with MedDRA v26.0. Both inhibitors shared signals for systemic AEs, such as peripheral oedema and gastrointestinal disorders. However, their respiratory AE profiles diverged: capmatinib was associated with pleural effusion and pulmonary oedema, whereas tepotinib was linked to infectious complications, including interstitial lung disease and infectious pleural effusion. Importantly, we identified significant novel signals beyond current drug labels: sensory disturbances, and thrombosis for capmatinib; and fluid imbalance-related events for tepotinib. These distinct AE profiles highlight an infection-driven pulmonary risk for tepotinib requiring close monitoring, while capmatinib's association with sensory disorders warrants specific patient management considerations. Our findings underscore the need for individualized safety monitoring based on the unique AE profiles of each MET inhibitor.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반