Real-world evaluation of immunotherapy in multi-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.
[OBJECTIVE] To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) across multiple lines of treatment.
- 95% CI 0.38-0.80
- HR 0.57
- 연구 설계 cohort study
APA
Li M, Min M, Deng F (2026). Real-world evaluation of immunotherapy in multi-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.. Current medical research and opinion, 42(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2624887
MLA
Li M, et al.. "Real-world evaluation of immunotherapy in multi-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.." Current medical research and opinion, vol. 42, no. 1, 2026, pp. 99-118.
PMID
41651801
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) across multiple lines of treatment.
[METHODS] We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing clinical data from 397 SCLC patients treated at the Second People's Hospital of Yichang (January 2018-July 2024). Based on treatment strategies, patients were divided into four groups: (1) first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs)-based combination therapy, (2) first-line chemotherapy, (3) later-line ICIs-based combination therapy after first-line chemotherapy, and (4) chemotherapy in all lines. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and safety were evaluated.
[RESULTS] After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable. In patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), first-line ICIs‑based combination therapy significantly improved median overall survival (OS, 12.9 vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.80; = 0.00189) and median progression-free survival (PFS, 8.0 vs. 5.6 months; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.80; = 0.00125) compared with chemotherapy alone. In the limited-stage cohort, first-line ICIs‑based combination therapy yielded numerically longer OSOS (40.0 vs. 15.5 months; = 0.121), though results are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution given sample limitations. In the later-line setting, ICIs‑based combination therapy significantly extended median OS compared with chemotherapy (10.4 vs. 7.4 months; HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98; = 0.0405). Exploratory analysis indicated longer OS with later-line versus first-line ICIs (22.6 vs. 12.6 months; HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.33; = 0.0255); however, this finding may be influenced by potential selection biases and guarantee-time bias and should be viewed as hypothesis-generating only. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 11.1-22.2%, indicating manageable toxicity.
[CONCLUSION] Immunotherapy, whether first-line or later-line, improves survival in ES-SCLC with acceptable safety. Our exploratory results suggest that later-line immunotherapy may be associated with favorable survival trends; however, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective trials due to inherent selection biases.
[METHODS] We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzing clinical data from 397 SCLC patients treated at the Second People's Hospital of Yichang (January 2018-July 2024). Based on treatment strategies, patients were divided into four groups: (1) first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs)-based combination therapy, (2) first-line chemotherapy, (3) later-line ICIs-based combination therapy after first-line chemotherapy, and (4) chemotherapy in all lines. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes and safety were evaluated.
[RESULTS] After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable. In patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), first-line ICIs‑based combination therapy significantly improved median overall survival (OS, 12.9 vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.80; = 0.00189) and median progression-free survival (PFS, 8.0 vs. 5.6 months; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.80; = 0.00125) compared with chemotherapy alone. In the limited-stage cohort, first-line ICIs‑based combination therapy yielded numerically longer OSOS (40.0 vs. 15.5 months; = 0.121), though results are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution given sample limitations. In the later-line setting, ICIs‑based combination therapy significantly extended median OS compared with chemotherapy (10.4 vs. 7.4 months; HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98; = 0.0405). Exploratory analysis indicated longer OS with later-line versus first-line ICIs (22.6 vs. 12.6 months; HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.12-5.33; = 0.0255); however, this finding may be influenced by potential selection biases and guarantee-time bias and should be viewed as hypothesis-generating only. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 11.1-22.2%, indicating manageable toxicity.
[CONCLUSION] Immunotherapy, whether first-line or later-line, improves survival in ES-SCLC with acceptable safety. Our exploratory results suggest that later-line immunotherapy may be associated with favorable survival trends; however, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective trials due to inherent selection biases.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Small Cell Lung Carcinoma; Male; Lung Neoplasms; Female; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Immunotherapy; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Aged, 80 and over
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Icariside II suppresses NF-κB/STAT3 signaling to prevent the progression of chronic atrophic gastritis toward gastric cancer.
- The protective role of a moderate protein diet in ETEC-infected piglets: Optimization of growth, immunity, and microbial balance.
- STOML2 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation, invasion and migration by activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Review).
- Kinesin Family Member 26A Disrupts DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex Formation to Enhance Chemoradiotherapy Sensitivity in Colorectal Cancer.
- Developing an automatic decision-assistance tool to choose proton/photon radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer.