Optimizing adjuvant therapy under the guidance of MPR: A multicenter retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

[BACKGROUND] Major pathological response (MPR) has emerged as a key surrogate endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its predictive value for long-term survival and its role in guiding individualized adjuvant therapy (AT) decisions require further validation in real-world populations.

[METHODS] This study is a multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included 373 NSCLC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) followed by radical surgery between January 2015 and December 2022. The primary endpoints were the cumulative incidence of death (CID) and the cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.

[RESULTS] The overall MPR rate was 38.3 % (143/373). Multivariate analysis confirmed MPR as an independent protective predictor for both CID (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.41, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.72, P = 0.002) and CIR (HR = 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.2-0.61, P < 0.001). Patients with MPR showed significantly better 5-year CID (14.6 % vs. 44.7 %) and CIR (16.4 % vs. 54.7 %) (both P < 0.001). The core finding of this study is that the survival benefit of AT depends on the interaction between the neoadjuvant treatment modality and MPR status: In patients who did not achieve MPR after NCT, AT significantly reduced 5-year CID (44.7 % vs. 74.6 %, P = 0.008); however, in all patients after NICT, regardless of MPR status, AT did not show significant survival benefit.

[CONCLUSION] MPR is a robust predictor of long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy for NSCLC. AT decisions should be based on a binary "treatment modality-pathological response" framework: non-MPR patients after NCT are clear candidates for intensive AT, whereas patients after NICT may not routinely require AT, regardless of MPR status.