본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Next-generation sequencing for lymphoid neoplasms: Real-world utility from a clinical assay.

2/5 보강
Human pathology 2026 Vol.173() p. 106123 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
384 cases were retrospectively reviewed in conjunction with pathology reports, including 121, 183, and 80 tested for the limited B-cell lymphoma panel (25 genes), expanded B-cell lymphoma panel (46 genes), or T-cell lymphoma panel (22 genes), respectively.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Although clinical guidelines have not yet widely incorporated LNGS, when carefully designed and selectively ordered by clinicians and pathologists, the majority of tests do offer prognostic and predictive data which can aid in optimization of clinical management. The diagnostic value of LNGS testing is likely to increase with its further use and availability.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Chen C, Artymiuk CJ, Schwab TL, Feldman AL, Jevremovic D, McPhail ED, Rech KL, Viswanatha DS, Hampel PJ, Wang Y, He R, King RL

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become the standard of care in myeloid neoplasms, the utility of lymphoma NGS (LNGS) in the clinical setting has not been well established.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Chuan‐Mu Chen, Tanya L. Schwab, et al. (2026). Next-generation sequencing for lymphoid neoplasms: Real-world utility from a clinical assay.. Human pathology, 173, 106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2026.106123
MLA Chuan‐Mu Chen, et al.. "Next-generation sequencing for lymphoid neoplasms: Real-world utility from a clinical assay.." Human pathology, vol. 173, 2026, pp. 106123.
PMID 41974312

Abstract

Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become the standard of care in myeloid neoplasms, the utility of lymphoma NGS (LNGS) in the clinical setting has not been well established. The goal of this study was to document the real-world use of LNGS panels and assess their prognostic, predictive, and diagnostic value. A total of 384 cases were retrospectively reviewed in conjunction with pathology reports, including 121, 183, and 80 tested for the limited B-cell lymphoma panel (25 genes), expanded B-cell lymphoma panel (46 genes), or T-cell lymphoma panel (22 genes), respectively. Specimen types included 170 (44.3%) bone marrow, 120 (31.3%) peripheral blood, and 93 (24.2%) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. 248/384 (64.6%) cases showed at least one mutation; 245/347 (70.6%) when excluding specimens known to be negative for lymphoma. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL/CLL, 40.6%) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL, 9.6%) were the most common lymphoma types tested. Mutations with prognostic value were found in 228/384 (59.4%) cases. 125 (32.6%) tests provided predictive value for response or resistance to a specific therapy. 36 tests (9.4%) provided diagnostic value, aiding the pathologist in classifying disease or rendering a more definitive diagnosis. LNGS results are most useful as being prognostic in CLL/SLL and MCL, diagnostic in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and hairy cell leukemia, theranostic in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, and diagnostic and prognostic in follicular lymphoma and T/NK-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Although clinical guidelines have not yet widely incorporated LNGS, when carefully designed and selectively ordered by clinicians and pathologists, the majority of tests do offer prognostic and predictive data which can aid in optimization of clinical management. The diagnostic value of LNGS testing is likely to increase with its further use and availability.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)