Differential Metastatic Patterns and Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation Scores in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearranged Versus Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Inflammation Scores in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearranged
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Negative Non
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
While routine inflammation markers showed limited utility in predicting site-specific metastasis, LDH levels correlated significantly with liver involvement. Aggressive management strategies are warranted for ALK-positive patients presenting with liver metastases.
: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form of malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities.
- 95% CI 1.050-2.494
- HR 1.618
APA
Özdemir M, Gököz Doğu G, et al. (2026). Differential Metastatic Patterns and Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation Scores in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearranged Versus Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.. Cancers, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030501
MLA
Özdemir M, et al.. "Differential Metastatic Patterns and Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammation Scores in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearranged Versus Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.." Cancers, vol. 18, no. 3, 2026.
PMID
41681973
Abstract
: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form of malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities. In clinical practice, metastatic sites are identified on a case-by-case basis. ALK rearrangements are detected in 3-5% of NSCLC cases and are known to have a tendency (tropism) to metastasize to the brain. : Data from 81 ALK-positive and 91 ALK-negative metastatic NSCLC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Systemic markers, including HALP score, NLR, PLR, LMR, and LDH, were calculated from blood tests at the time of metastasis. Optimal cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. : ALK-positive patients were significantly associated with female gender ( = 0.002), non-smoking status ( = 0.001), adenocarcinoma histology ( = 0.001), and a higher incidence of brain metastases ( = 0.001). In univariate analysis, age, time to metastasis, liver metastasis, and NLR were prognostic for survival. Crucially, multivariate analysis identified liver metastasis as an independent predictor of poor prognosis (HR = 1.618; 95% CI: 1.050-2.494; = 0.029), indicating a 61.8% increased risk of death or progression. While inflammation markers (NLR, HALP, PLR, LMR) did not predict metastasis to specific sites, elevated LDH levels were significantly associated with liver metastasis ( = 0.007). : ALK-positive NSCLC demonstrates a marked CNS tropism; however, liver metastasis remains a more critical adverse prognostic factor than brain metastasis in real-world settings. While routine inflammation markers showed limited utility in predicting site-specific metastasis, LDH levels correlated significantly with liver involvement. Aggressive management strategies are warranted for ALK-positive patients presenting with liver metastases.