Investigation of Two New Grafting Techniques for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: An Experimental Study with New Zealand White Rabbits.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Cartilage is an important source in supporting the structure of the nose for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. However, it is known that its viability is not always on the ideal level. Various wrapping materials are used to increase the strength of cartilage. Donor site morbidity, which develops following the harvesting of both cartilage and fascia as one such cover material, has attracted interest in recent years.
[OBJECTIVE] In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of dermis and tendon autografts as alternatives to fascia and cartilage.
[MATERIAL AND METHOD] The sample of the study included 16 New Zealand white rabbits. The right auricular cartilage of all rabbits was amputated, and it was transformed into diced cartilage autografts. The dermis autografts from the right gluteal areas of the rabbits were deepithelialized, and lumbosacral fascia autografts were harvested from the same incision. Additionally, the Achilles tendon of each rabbit was harvested and transformed into diced tendon autografts. Four different autografts were embedded under the skin of each rabbit from 4 different pouches opened in the back of the rabbit. These autografts included diced cartilage alone (Intervention 1), fascia-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 2), dermis-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 3) and fascia-wrapped tendon (Intervention 4) autografts.
[RESULTS] Intervention 1 had the most irregular appearance, the outcomes in Intervention 4 were volumetrically smaller and softer. Connective tissue formed between the diced pieces in all interventions, and it was observed that the dermis and fascia had a capsule-like appearance, and their viability was preserved. The differences between the initial and final measurements of the volumes of interventions 1, 2 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the initial and final volumetric measurements of intervention 4 (p > 0.05). More peripheral proliferation was observed in the interventions of fascia-wrapped and dermis-wrapped diced cartilage compared to the other interventions. The intervention including fascia-wrapped diced tendon grafts had displayed more fibrosis, fragmentation and collagen fibers, while it showed a lower amount of elastic fiber. There were no significant differences among the intervention in terms of other histological parameters.
[CONCLUSION] Tendon autografts may be a good option for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty as they are easily harvested and have minimal donor site morbidity. Dermis autograft usage is more advantageous than fascia usage in terms of accessibility and convenience.
[NO LEVEL ASSIGNED] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[OBJECTIVE] In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of dermis and tendon autografts as alternatives to fascia and cartilage.
[MATERIAL AND METHOD] The sample of the study included 16 New Zealand white rabbits. The right auricular cartilage of all rabbits was amputated, and it was transformed into diced cartilage autografts. The dermis autografts from the right gluteal areas of the rabbits were deepithelialized, and lumbosacral fascia autografts were harvested from the same incision. Additionally, the Achilles tendon of each rabbit was harvested and transformed into diced tendon autografts. Four different autografts were embedded under the skin of each rabbit from 4 different pouches opened in the back of the rabbit. These autografts included diced cartilage alone (Intervention 1), fascia-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 2), dermis-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 3) and fascia-wrapped tendon (Intervention 4) autografts.
[RESULTS] Intervention 1 had the most irregular appearance, the outcomes in Intervention 4 were volumetrically smaller and softer. Connective tissue formed between the diced pieces in all interventions, and it was observed that the dermis and fascia had a capsule-like appearance, and their viability was preserved. The differences between the initial and final measurements of the volumes of interventions 1, 2 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the initial and final volumetric measurements of intervention 4 (p > 0.05). More peripheral proliferation was observed in the interventions of fascia-wrapped and dermis-wrapped diced cartilage compared to the other interventions. The intervention including fascia-wrapped diced tendon grafts had displayed more fibrosis, fragmentation and collagen fibers, while it showed a lower amount of elastic fiber. There were no significant differences among the intervention in terms of other histological parameters.
[CONCLUSION] Tendon autografts may be a good option for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty as they are easily harvested and have minimal donor site morbidity. Dermis autograft usage is more advantageous than fascia usage in terms of accessibility and convenience.
[NO LEVEL ASSIGNED] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | tendon autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | fascia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | gluteal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | pouches
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Connective tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | capsule-like
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | peripheral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | tendon grafts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Cadaver
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | nose
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | cartilage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | dermis
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | Achilles tendon
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | Dorsal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 재료 | auricular cartilage
|
이개연골 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [MATERIAL AND
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] Intervention 1
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [NO
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION] Cartilage
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | fibrosis
|
C0016059
Fibrosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | cartilage autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | dermis autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | lumbosacral fascia autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | rabbit
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | tendon autografts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | collagen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Rabbits
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | dorsal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | fascia
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Animals; Rabbits; Rhinoplasty; Transplantation, Autologous; Tendons; Fascia; Autografts; Tissue and Organ Harvesting; Dermis; Ear Cartilage
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.