본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group.

1/5 보강
European urology 2026 Vol.89(1) p. 18-28
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: newly diagnosed MIBC should be offered evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting for consideration of BPTs
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
These include partial cystectomy (PC) for urachal adenocarcinoma and PC or radical transurethral resection alone for solitary tumors amenable to resection with adequate margins and without concomitant CIS or histologic subtypes. [CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BPTs for MIBC.

Gupta S, Hensley PJ, Li R, Choudhury A, Daneshmand S, Faltas BM, Flaig TW, Grass GD, Grivas P, Hansel DE, Hassanzadeh C, Kassouf W, Kukreja J, Mendoza-Valdés A, Moschini M, Mouw KW, Navai N, Necchi A, Rosenberg JE, Ross JS, Siefker-Radtke AO, Taylor J, Willliams SB, Zlotta AR, Buckley R, Kamat AM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Patient-centric management necessitates providing care aligned with patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Gupta S, Hensley PJ, et al. (2026). Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group.. European urology, 89(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.017
MLA Gupta S, et al.. "Bladder Preservation Strategies in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group.." European urology, vol. 89, no. 1, 2026, pp. 18-28.
PMID 40268594

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Patient-centric management necessitates providing care aligned with patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs. Therefore, critical assessment of bladder preservation therapies (BPTs) as alternatives to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and practical recommendations on the optimal selection of patients for BPTs are needed urgently.

[METHODS] A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop BPT recommendations for MIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and drafted recommendations, which were voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined based on discussions. Final recommendations achieved ≥75% agreement during the meeting, with further refinements through web conferences and e-mail discussions.

[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Patients with newly diagnosed MIBC should be offered evaluation in a multidisciplinary setting for consideration of BPTs. The main alternative to RC is trimodal therapy (TMT), and favorable prognostic factors for TMT include unifocal cT2 stage, lack of hydronephrosis, and no multifocal carcinoma in situ (CIS). Other options should be reserved for very select patients who are ineligible for or who decline TMT or RC after thorough consideration of benefits versus risks. These include partial cystectomy (PC) for urachal adenocarcinoma and PC or radical transurethral resection alone for solitary tumors amenable to resection with adequate margins and without concomitant CIS or histologic subtypes.

[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BPTs for MIBC.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Cystectomy; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Organ Sparing Treatments; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)