본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Combining evidence and practice: evaluating proton re-irradiation in recurrent lung cancer.

1/5 보강
International journal of radiation biology 2026 Vol.102(5) p. 512-519
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
343 patients with recurrent lung cancer treated with PRT.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] PRT demonstrates promising efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with recurrent lung cancer. While these findings are encouraging, they should be interpreted cautiously given the limited high-level evidence, and prospective randomized studies are needed to further define the role of PRT relative to photon-based re-irradiation.

Liu Y, He J, Li B, Wang Y, Yang H, Wang L

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.8%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Locoregional recurrence of lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy remains a clinical challenge.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Liu Y, He J, et al. (2026). Combining evidence and practice: evaluating proton re-irradiation in recurrent lung cancer.. International journal of radiation biology, 102(5), 512-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2026.2630994
MLA Liu Y, et al.. "Combining evidence and practice: evaluating proton re-irradiation in recurrent lung cancer.." International journal of radiation biology, vol. 102, no. 5, 2026, pp. 512-519.
PMID 41718539 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Locoregional recurrence of lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Although re-irradiation offers curative potential, its application is limited by cumulative toxicity to organs at risk. Proton re-irradiation therapy (PRT) provides favorable dosimetric properties that may mitigate treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

[METHODS] We conducted a meta-analysis of eight studies including 343 patients with recurrent lung cancer treated with PRT. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Additionally, a single-center retrospective cohort of 12 patients treated with PRT between November 2023 and April 2024 was analyzed as real-world evidence.

[RESULTS] The pooled 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 62% and 45%, respectively; the corresponding PFS rates were 47% and 28%. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 22%, and grade 5 AEs occurred in up to 10.5% of patients. In the institutional cohort, the 1-year OS was 66.7%, with only one patient (8.3%) experiencing a grade ≥3 AEs.

[CONCLUSION] PRT demonstrates promising efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with recurrent lung cancer. While these findings are encouraging, they should be interpreted cautiously given the limited high-level evidence, and prospective randomized studies are needed to further define the role of PRT relative to photon-based re-irradiation.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반