본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older patients: A FAERS-based analysis of serious and fatal adverse events.

1/5 보강
Journal of geriatric oncology 📖 저널 OA 20.7% 2024: 0/2 OA 2025: 1/9 OA 2026: 11/47 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.17(2) p. 102820
Retraction 확인
출처

Petrelli F, Iaculli A, Parati MC, Borgonovo K, Ghilardi M, Lonati V

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] CDK4/6 inhibitors-abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib-are standard treatments for hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.18-1.99

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Petrelli F, Iaculli A, et al. (2026). Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older patients: A FAERS-based analysis of serious and fatal adverse events.. Journal of geriatric oncology, 17(2), 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102820
MLA Petrelli F, et al.. "Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors in older patients: A FAERS-based analysis of serious and fatal adverse events.." Journal of geriatric oncology, vol. 17, no. 2, 2026, pp. 102820.
PMID 41380504 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] CDK4/6 inhibitors-abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib-are standard treatments for hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials, and age-related safety data remain limited in real-world settings.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using 44,100 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) involving patients aged ≥65 years treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Primary endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal outcomes. A secondary analysis compared adverse events between patients aged <65 and 65-85 years, calculating odds ratios (ORs) for selected toxicities, including death, disease progression, diarrhea, and myelosuppression.

[RESULTS] Among older patients, 71.2 % of reports involved SAEs and 5.3 % were fatal. Abemaciclib was linked to higher risk of death in those aged 65-85 compared to younger adults (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.18-1.99), but lower odds of myelosuppression (OR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.26-0.53). Palbociclib showed similar death risk across age groups (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.92-1.05) and reduced risk of disease progression in older adults (OR 0.72; 95 % CI 0.61-0.84). Ribociclib showed no significant age-related difference in fatality (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.87-1.17) but had the highest overall death risk (OR 9.14 vs palbociclib; 95 % CI 7.70-10.84).

[DISCUSSION] Real-world data reveal drug- and age-specific toxicity differences. Ribociclib and abemaciclib pose higher risks in older adults compared to palbociclib, supporting the need for personalized treatment and careful monitoring in older patients.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 2개

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반