State of the Art of Systemic Therapy in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.
리뷰
1/5 보강
[OBJECTIVES] To synthesize current evidence and emerging data on systemic treatment strategies for early-stage and locally advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carc
APA
Petrelli F, Ghilardi M, et al. (2026). State of the Art of Systemic Therapy in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14020046
MLA
Petrelli F, et al.. "State of the Art of Systemic Therapy in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.." Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 2, 2026.
PMID
41745084
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] To synthesize current evidence and emerging data on systemic treatment strategies for early-stage and locally advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with emphasis on treatment de-escalation and the integration of immunotherapy.
[DATA SOURCES] We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE for English-language studies published from 2010 to 2025 using terms related to HPV-positive disease, oropharyngeal carcinoma, de-escalation, chemoradiation, and immunotherapy.
[REVIEW METHODS] Peer-reviewed clinical trials, meta-analyses, and key translational studies addressing systemic therapy, biomarkers, and immunotherapeutic strategies in HPV-positive OPSCC were included. Emphasis was placed on phase II-III trials evaluating cisplatin-sparing regimens, cetuximab substitution, radiation dose reduction, and early-phase immunotherapy combinations. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively.
[RESULTS] Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation remains the standard of care for locally advanced HPV-positive OPSCC. De-intensification trials suggest that reduced-intensity regimens may be feasible in carefully selected low-risk patients; however, replacing cisplatin with cetuximab results in inferior survival. PD-1 inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab, nivolumab) provide durable responses in recurrent/metastatic disease and are under active evaluation in earlier stages and in combination with therapeutic vaccines, bispecific antibodies, and viral-vector platforms.
[CONCLUSIONS] Systemic therapy for HPV-positive OPSCC is moving toward biomarker-informed personalization. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation remains the curative backbone, while rational de-escalation and immunotherapy integration may preserve high cure rates while reducing long-term toxicity. Ongoing phase III trials will clarify which patient subsets are most suitable for de-intensified or immunotherapeutic approaches, guiding future standards of care.
[DATA SOURCES] We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE for English-language studies published from 2010 to 2025 using terms related to HPV-positive disease, oropharyngeal carcinoma, de-escalation, chemoradiation, and immunotherapy.
[REVIEW METHODS] Peer-reviewed clinical trials, meta-analyses, and key translational studies addressing systemic therapy, biomarkers, and immunotherapeutic strategies in HPV-positive OPSCC were included. Emphasis was placed on phase II-III trials evaluating cisplatin-sparing regimens, cetuximab substitution, radiation dose reduction, and early-phase immunotherapy combinations. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively.
[RESULTS] Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation remains the standard of care for locally advanced HPV-positive OPSCC. De-intensification trials suggest that reduced-intensity regimens may be feasible in carefully selected low-risk patients; however, replacing cisplatin with cetuximab results in inferior survival. PD-1 inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab, nivolumab) provide durable responses in recurrent/metastatic disease and are under active evaluation in earlier stages and in combination with therapeutic vaccines, bispecific antibodies, and viral-vector platforms.
[CONCLUSIONS] Systemic therapy for HPV-positive OPSCC is moving toward biomarker-informed personalization. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation remains the curative backbone, while rational de-escalation and immunotherapy integration may preserve high cure rates while reducing long-term toxicity. Ongoing phase III trials will clarify which patient subsets are most suitable for de-intensified or immunotherapeutic approaches, guiding future standards of care.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Phase III placebo-controlled oncology trials in the last decade: evolution, methodological foundations, and clinical impact.
- Real-world evidence for 10 oncology drugs approved in the last 5 years: A comprehensive narrative synthesis.
- Rethinking Optimal Therapy for Operable Pancreatic Cancer in the CASSANDRA Era.
- Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Cancer: Where We Are Now, What It Changes, and What to Watch Next.
- Comparison of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for muscle invasive bladder cancer: A network meta-analysis.