본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A prospective multicenter trial of deep learning auto-segmentation for organs at risk in thoracic radiotherapy.

Nature communications 2026

Niu G, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Song Y, Yan M, Li S, Liu T, Huang S, Chen J, Wang X, Zhang W, Meng M, Liu Y, Chen J, Fu Y, Zhao D, Huang J, Yang K, Cao J, Yuan H, Guo S, Pei X, Wu D, Nan Y, Yan Z, Lu Y, Zhao L, Yuan Z

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Widespread clinical implementation of rapidly evolving auto-segmentation tools remains constrained by a scarcity of high-quality prospective evidence.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.0001

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Niu G, Guan Y, et al. (2026). A prospective multicenter trial of deep learning auto-segmentation for organs at risk in thoracic radiotherapy.. Nature communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70863-9
MLA Niu G, et al.. "A prospective multicenter trial of deep learning auto-segmentation for organs at risk in thoracic radiotherapy.." Nature communications, 2026.
PMID 41917034

Abstract

Widespread clinical implementation of rapidly evolving auto-segmentation tools remains constrained by a scarcity of high-quality prospective evidence. Here we show the results of a prospective, multicenter, observational trial (NCT05787522) evaluating the clinical performance of a deep learning model (iCurveE) for artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted delineation of organs at risk (OARs) in thoracic and breast cancer radiotherapy. Computed tomography images from 500 patients across five centers are annotated by 37 physicians using manual, AI-generated, and AI-assisted methods. Eleven thoracic OARs are evaluated based on the primary endpoints of volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC) and contouring time, alongside secondary metrics including 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95). We prospectively annotate 2,483 OAR sets (27,043 OARs): 993 manual, 497 AI-generated, and 993 AI-assisted. AI-assisted delineation achieves significantly better vDSC (mean, 0.902) and HD95 (mean, 5.20 mm) than manual delineation (mean vDSC, 0.857; mean HD95, 8.01 mm; p < 0.0001) while improving time efficiency by 81.63% (median: 10.0 vs. 55.0 min; p < 0.0001). AI-assisted delineation reduces performance variability across centers and physicians with varying expertise. This study validates the clinical applicability of AI-assisted delineation in improving delineation performance and promoting healthcare equity.