본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: Updated systematic review, individual-patient-data meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Surgery 2026 Vol.193() p. 109872 Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Rese
TL;DR GBCA injection is a cornerstone of multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of HNCs, and Arterial spin labeling is emerging as a compelling alternative for PWI, eliminating the need for GBCA administration.
OpenAlex 토픽 · Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment

Tan HL, Zhao Y, Chua DW, Ng KYY, Lee SY, Lee JJX, Tai DW, Goh BKP, Koh YX

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

GBCA injection is a cornerstone of multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis, staging, and monitoring of HNCs, and Arterial spin labeling is emerging as a compelling alternative for PWI, eliminating the n

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.68-1.05
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Hwee Leong Tan, Yun Zhao, et al. (2026). Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: Updated systematic review, individual-patient-data meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Surgery, 193, 109872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109872
MLA Hwee Leong Tan, et al.. "Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: Updated systematic review, individual-patient-data meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.." Surgery, vol. 193, 2026, pp. 109872.
PMID 41381268

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The oncologic benefit of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains uncertain. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

[METHODS] Searches of various databases identified 9 randomized controlled trials comprising 604 neoadjuvant therapy and 527 upfront surgery patients. Hazard ratios for overall survival and event-free survival were extracted or reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios under a random effects model.

[RESULTS] Neoadjuvant therapy produced a significant improvement in event-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.90) but only a nonsignificant trend toward better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.05). One-stage individual patient data reconstruction showed median overall survival rising from 23.7 to 29.6 months (+5.9 months) and median event-free survival from 11.4 to 13.6 months (+2.2 months). Although R0 resection rates appeared higher with neoadjuvant therapy (58.8% vs 52.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.27). Neoadjuvant therapy reduced noncurative surgeries (surgical exploration rate: risk ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.94) and doubled the likelihood of node-negative histology (pN0; 1.73, 95% CI 1.31-2.28). Other outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups. Trial sequential analysis (α = .05, 80% power) confirmed that the event-free survival benefit is definitive, but indicated that both overall survival and R0 resection findings remain inconclusive because of insufficient accumulated data.

[CONCLUSION] Neoadjuvant therapy significantly prolongs event-free survival, lowers unnecessary surgical exploration and increases pN0 resections in resectable pancreatic cancer. Further adequately powered trials are still needed to confirm the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on overall survival and R0 resection rates.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pancreatectomy; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Treatment Outcome

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)