본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2025 Vol.32(10) p. 745-755

Tan HL, Liauw CYT, Chua TL, Lam AYR, Chan C, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Chung AYF, Goh BKP

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] A robust prognostication model after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can guide clinical management.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • 추적기간 19.2 months

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Tan HL, Liauw CYT, et al. (2025). Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 32(10), 745-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12186
MLA Tan HL, et al.. "Comparison Between Cox Proportional Hazards and Machine Learning Models for the Prognostication of Recurrence and Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.." Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, vol. 32, no. 10, 2025, pp. 745-755.
PMID 40685544
DOI 10.1002/jhbp.12186

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] A robust prognostication model after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can guide clinical management. We aimed to develop a prognostication model for HCC recurrence and survival following liver resection, comparing between Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and supervised machine learning models.

[METHODS] We studied all patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between January 1, 2000 and October 31, 2022 at our institution. We aimed to predict recurrence-free survival following resection and identify risk categories for HCC recurrence. The CPH model and two supervised machine learning models (random survival forest [RSF] and extreme gradient boosting [XGB]) were used. Model performance was assessed with C-index, time-dependent area under curve (tdAUC) and Brier score.

[RESULTS] We studied 1290 patients, with 737 (57.1%) experiencing an event (HCC recurrence or death) over a median follow-up duration of 19.2 months. The CPH model had the overall best performance (C-index: 0.663, tdAUC at 6 months: 0.752; 1 year: 0.740; 2 years: 0.722; 5 years: 0.624). Using this model, patients stratified based on risk score could be discriminated between low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (p < 0.001).

[CONCLUSION] A CPH-derived prognostication model was effective for predicting and risk stratifying recurrence and survival following liver resection for HCC.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Machine Learning; Male; Female; Hepatectomy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)