An algorithm for one-stage malignant oncologic scalp reconstruction.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Scalp reconstruction has always been a challenging problem after oncological resection. Advanced surgical techniques can reconstruct any defects, but there are a large number of patients who cannot benefit from surgery for immature strategies. The authors here describe an algorithm for selecting the best reconstructive categories and minimizing complications according to the surgical defect of scalp tumors.
[METHODS] A single-institution retrospective review was conducted that included 173 patients with scalp tumors treated with surgery followed by reconstruction. Patients were identified by tumor type and nature; the location of scalp defect, size, and depth; the types of reconstructions and surgical. A systematic algorithm was developed according to our findings and current literature.
[RESULTS] Small defects (≤4 cm) could be closed by primary closure. Medium defects (4-30 cm) were reconstructed by local flaps. We routinely used skin graft for significant surgical defects (30-90 cm). And the tumor's location did not have an impact on reconstructive categories of above three types of defects. Free flaps should reconstruct very large-sized defects (>90 cm) in frontal, temporal, and vertex locations while pedicle flaps suited for occipital defects due to its anatomic vicinity. The reconstruction algorithm of recurrent disease was like the management in primary tumors except for the medium size defect in the occipital region that was primarily reconstructed by a skin graft. Multiple free flaps reconstruction is the best possibility for total scalp resection. Free flap reconstruction is used mainly for composite resection of the scalp, calvarium, and dura.
[CONCLUSIONS] Successful scalp reconstruction requires careful preoperative assessment, flexible and precisely intraoperative management. The algorithm based on defect size, depth, and location can supply some degree of guidelines when considering choosing suitable reconstructive procedures.
[METHODS] A single-institution retrospective review was conducted that included 173 patients with scalp tumors treated with surgery followed by reconstruction. Patients were identified by tumor type and nature; the location of scalp defect, size, and depth; the types of reconstructions and surgical. A systematic algorithm was developed according to our findings and current literature.
[RESULTS] Small defects (≤4 cm) could be closed by primary closure. Medium defects (4-30 cm) were reconstructed by local flaps. We routinely used skin graft for significant surgical defects (30-90 cm). And the tumor's location did not have an impact on reconstructive categories of above three types of defects. Free flaps should reconstruct very large-sized defects (>90 cm) in frontal, temporal, and vertex locations while pedicle flaps suited for occipital defects due to its anatomic vicinity. The reconstruction algorithm of recurrent disease was like the management in primary tumors except for the medium size defect in the occipital region that was primarily reconstructed by a skin graft. Multiple free flaps reconstruction is the best possibility for total scalp resection. Free flap reconstruction is used mainly for composite resection of the scalp, calvarium, and dura.
[CONCLUSIONS] Successful scalp reconstruction requires careful preoperative assessment, flexible and precisely intraoperative management. The algorithm based on defect size, depth, and location can supply some degree of guidelines when considering choosing suitable reconstructive procedures.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | skin graft
|
피부이식 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | free flap
|
피판재건술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | scalp
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Medium
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | occipital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | flap
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | calvarium
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | scalp
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | frontal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | dura
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Scalp
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] Small defects
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | scalp tumors
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | tumor
|
C0027651
Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Small defects
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | occipital defects
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | primary tumors
|
C0677930
Primary Neoplasm
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | disease
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | tumors
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | pedicle flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | occipital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | flaps
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.