[Influence of epididymitis history on the results of vasoepididyostomy in patients with epididymal obstruction].
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the influence of epididymitis history on the results of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and spontaneous pregnancy in patients with epididymal obstruction.
[METHODS] Totally 205 patients with epididymal obstruction underwent microsurgical two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy from January 2014 to December 2016. After surgery, we evaluated the semen quality of the patients every 3 months till conception and compared the rates of patency and spontaneous pregnancy between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history.
[RESULTS] The patients ranged in age from 22 to 46 (mean 31) years, 37 (22.2%) with and 126 (77.8%) without an epididymitis history among the 163 patients for whom a 25.4-month follow-up (from 7 to 42 months) was completed. No statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history in the patency rate (73.0% vs 81.7%, P = 0.243), sperm concentration (18 [1.3-33.6] vs 15.2 [0.8-33.4] ×10⁶/ml, P = 0.710), percentage of progressively motile sperm (27.5 [0-46.1]% vs 19.3 [0-41]% (P = 0.592) or rate of spontaneous pregnancy (24.3% vs 38.9%, P = 0.104).
[CONCLUSION] Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective method for the treatment of epididymal obstruction, and epididymitis history does not affect the results of the strategy.
[METHODS] Totally 205 patients with epididymal obstruction underwent microsurgical two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy from January 2014 to December 2016. After surgery, we evaluated the semen quality of the patients every 3 months till conception and compared the rates of patency and spontaneous pregnancy between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history.
[RESULTS] The patients ranged in age from 22 to 46 (mean 31) years, 37 (22.2%) with and 126 (77.8%) without an epididymitis history among the 163 patients for whom a 25.4-month follow-up (from 7 to 42 months) was completed. No statistically significant differences were observed postoperatively between the patients with and those without an epididymitis history in the patency rate (73.0% vs 81.7%, P = 0.243), sperm concentration (18 [1.3-33.6] vs 15.2 [0.8-33.4] ×10⁶/ml, P = 0.710), percentage of progressively motile sperm (27.5 [0-46.1]% vs 19.3 [0-41]% (P = 0.592) or rate of spontaneous pregnancy (24.3% vs 38.9%, P = 0.104).
[CONCLUSION] Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective method for the treatment of epididymal obstruction, and epididymitis history does not affect the results of the strategy.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | epididymal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | sperm
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [0.8-33.4]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | epididymitis
|
C0014534
Epididymitis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | epididymal obstruction
|
C4312995
Epididymal obstruction
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Male; Adult; Epididymis; Epididymitis; Semen Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Microsurgery; Semen; Vas Deferens