Prospective in vivo evaluation of three different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of hyaluronidase with long-term follow-up.
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Several injectable hyaluronic acid dermal fillers exist in the market, each with different rheologic and cross-linking properties. Their reversibility is useful for managing complications. We sought to determine the response of three different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of hyaluronidase.
[METHODS] Each of 18 arms of nine subjects were prospectively randomized to receive intradermal injections of hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane-L, Juvéderm Ultra, Juvéderm Voluma). Seven sites on each arm were randomized to receive 0.2 mL of hyaluronic acid gel in anticipation of dissolution 1 week later with varying doses of hyaluronidase (Hylenex), 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 units or to be a control site. The outcome measures of diameter, elevation, and firmness were measured pre-injection and at varying time points to beyond 4 years. Subjects, graders, and injectors were masked.
[RESULTS] The most dramatic changes for all fillers occurred starting at the 30-min time point through 3 h time point, with continued gradual degradation through week 2. A mild dose response was found for Juvéderm and Restylane; however, a clear dose response was seen from 2.5 to 10 units for Voluma, with 2.5 units showing features more like those of saline only or no hyaluronidase control. One Restylane arm had controls lasting four years.
[CONCLUSIONS] All fillers had a dose response, with Voluma exhibiting it most clearly. Voluma required higher doses of hyaluronidase for dissolution, i.e., more than 20 units per 0.2 mL of filler. Restylane appeared to respond most readily to hyaluronidase, at the dose of even 2.5 units, but it also was fastest to dissolve on its own.
[METHODS] Each of 18 arms of nine subjects were prospectively randomized to receive intradermal injections of hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane-L, Juvéderm Ultra, Juvéderm Voluma). Seven sites on each arm were randomized to receive 0.2 mL of hyaluronic acid gel in anticipation of dissolution 1 week later with varying doses of hyaluronidase (Hylenex), 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 units or to be a control site. The outcome measures of diameter, elevation, and firmness were measured pre-injection and at varying time points to beyond 4 years. Subjects, graders, and injectors were masked.
[RESULTS] The most dramatic changes for all fillers occurred starting at the 30-min time point through 3 h time point, with continued gradual degradation through week 2. A mild dose response was found for Juvéderm and Restylane; however, a clear dose response was seen from 2.5 to 10 units for Voluma, with 2.5 units showing features more like those of saline only or no hyaluronidase control. One Restylane arm had controls lasting four years.
[CONCLUSIONS] All fillers had a dose response, with Voluma exhibiting it most clearly. Voluma required higher doses of hyaluronidase for dissolution, i.e., more than 20 units per 0.2 mL of filler. Restylane appeared to respond most readily to hyaluronidase, at the dose of even 2.5 units, but it also was fastest to dissolve on its own.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 5 | |
| 시술 | filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Arm; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Follow-Up Studies; Gels; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Hyaluronoglucosaminidase; Injections, Subcutaneous; Prospective Studies
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.