Efficacy and Safety of New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Fold Correction: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are a common cosmetic concern. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers are increasingly popular for minimally invasive facial wrinkle and fold correction. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic HA filler, Curea, for NLF correction compared with the widely used Juvéderm.
[METHODS] A 24-week, prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, split-face, noninferiority controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-four participants with moderate to severe NLFs were enrolled and treated with Curea on one side of the face and Juvéderm on the other. Evaluation included NLF improvement as determined using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale, participant satisfaction, and adverse events.
[RESULTS] At 24 weeks, Curea significantly improved Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale scores from 3.16 ± 0.84 at baseline to 2.59 ± 0.87 at week 24 ( P < 0.001). Curea demonstrated efficacy for NLF correction within the predefined noninferiority margin compared with Juvéderm. The safety profiles and participant satisfaction for Curea were similar to those for Juvéderm. Only mild, transient local reactions were observed, and participants were satisfied with the clinical improvement of both fillers throughout the 24-week follow-up.
[CONCLUSION] Curea is comparable to Juvéderm in NLF correction and safety profiles, and its efficacy lasts up to 24 weeks.
[METHODS] A 24-week, prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, split-face, noninferiority controlled trial was conducted. Seventy-four participants with moderate to severe NLFs were enrolled and treated with Curea on one side of the face and Juvéderm on the other. Evaluation included NLF improvement as determined using the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale, participant satisfaction, and adverse events.
[RESULTS] At 24 weeks, Curea significantly improved Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale scores from 3.16 ± 0.84 at baseline to 2.59 ± 0.87 at week 24 ( P < 0.001). Curea demonstrated efficacy for NLF correction within the predefined noninferiority margin compared with Juvéderm. The safety profiles and participant satisfaction for Curea were similar to those for Juvéderm. Only mild, transient local reactions were observed, and participants were satisfied with the clinical improvement of both fillers throughout the 24-week follow-up.
[CONCLUSION] Curea is comparable to Juvéderm in NLF correction and safety profiles, and its efficacy lasts up to 24 weeks.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 2 | |
| 재료 | ha
|
히알루론산 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | ha filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Cosmetic Techniques; Dermal Fillers; Double-Blind Method; Hyaluronic Acid; Nasolabial Fold; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.