Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Assessment of Chin Retrusion.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] A validated scale is needed for objective and reproducible comparisons of chin appearance before and after chin augmentation in practice and clinical studies.
[OBJECTIVE] To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale.
[METHODS] The Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 298) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart.
[RESULTS] A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.07 [0.94-1.20] for clinically different image pairs and 0.51 [0.39-0.63] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was substantial (mean weighted kappa = 0.79). Interrater agreement was substantial during the second rating session (0.68, primary end point).
[CONCLUSION] The Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of severity of chin retrusion.
[OBJECTIVE] To describe the development and validation of the 5-point photonumeric Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale.
[METHODS] The Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale was developed to include an assessment guide, verbal descriptors, morphed images, and real subject images for each scale grade. The clinical significance of a 1-point score difference was evaluated in a review of multiple image pairs representing varying differences in severity. Interrater and intrarater reliability was evaluated in a live-subject validation study (N = 298) completed during 2 sessions occurring 3 weeks apart.
[RESULTS] A difference of ≥1 point on the scale was shown to reflect a clinically meaningful difference (mean [95% confidence interval] absolute score difference, 1.07 [0.94-1.20] for clinically different image pairs and 0.51 [0.39-0.63] for not clinically different pairs). Intrarater agreement between the 2 live-subject validation sessions was substantial (mean weighted kappa = 0.79). Interrater agreement was substantial during the second rating session (0.68, primary end point).
[CONCLUSION] The Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale is a validated and reliable scale for physician rating of severity of chin retrusion.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | chin augmentation
|
턱끝성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | Retrusion
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | chin retrusion
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] A
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | live-subject
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [RESULTS] A
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Weights and Measures; Chin; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Photography; Reproducibility of Results; Severity of Illness Index; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Long-term effects of inferior alveolar nerve injury on the quality of life of orthognathic patients: a clinical assessment.
- Mapping the Mandibular Lingual Foramina for Safer Chin Surgery: CT Morphometry and Predictive Modeling.
- Effectiveness and Safety of a Polyvinyl Alcohol Microsphere and Hyaluronic Acid Suspension for Chin Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Multidisciplinary Study.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Two High-G' Soft Tissue Fillers for Chin Augmentation: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Evaluator-Blinded Trial.
- Minimally Invasive Protocol for the Management of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: Case Series on Seven Patients.