A Preliminary Clinical Trial Comparing Split Treatments to the Face and Hand With Autologous Fat Grafting and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): A 3D, IRB-Approved Study.

[BACKGROUND] Numerous methodologies have been suggested to enhance fat graft survival, but few long-term studies are available.

[OBJECTIVES] The authors of this institutional review board-approved study investigated the safety and efficacy of utilizing platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

[METHODS] Each of 10 patients received equal volumes of syringe-harvested, centrifuged fat to opposing midfaces with a lateral submuscular aponeurotic system-plication or no face lift and hands that were combined with equal volumes of either concentrated PRP or normal saline. Comparable assessments of fat retention/baseline values by 3D Vectra Analysis, VISIA, and Cortex facial skin analyses were performed. Clinical results were judged on a visual analogue scale.

[RESULTS] The average percent change in mean volume assessments at the fat/PRP sites from baseline values, as profiled by 3D Vectra Analysis, demonstrated a higher, but statistically nonsignificant value over 1 year than the percent value changes at the fat/normal saline sites in the opposing face or hand. Three independent evaluators were able to assess volume restorations to the malar fat pad, naso-jugal groove, and nasolabial fold as well as to intermetacarpal hollowness with reduction of visible veins and tendons in the anterior midface and hands with both treatments. No adverse events were observed over the year-long study. Perioperative edema, erythema, bruising, and tenderness lasted up to 1 to 2 weeks at most.

[CONCLUSIONS] Autologous fat grafting continues to be a safe and effective adjunct in facial and hand aesthetic surgery. This study will require more patients and longer follow-up periods to determine whether PRP has a potential role to increase fat graft retention in aesthetic patients.