본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy by mismatch repair status in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Future science OA 2025 Vol.11(1) p. 2541517
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) via network meta-analysis
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
prior chemotherapy, the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab strategy shows promise
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] ICIs offered advantages for the dMMR population, whereas selinexor could provide survival benefits for the pMMR population. For pMMR patients who have received prior chemotherapy, the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab strategy shows promise.

Tang Y, Chen Y, Zeng T, Huang K, Zhao J, Zhang P, Shu C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] This study evaluated the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or targeted therapies in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) patients with a

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Tang Y, Chen Y, et al. (2025). Immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy by mismatch repair status in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.. Future science OA, 11(1), 2541517. https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2025.2541517
MLA Tang Y, et al.. "Immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy by mismatch repair status in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.." Future science OA, vol. 11, no. 1, 2025, pp. 2541517.
PMID 40804781

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] This study evaluated the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or targeted therapies in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) via network meta-analysis.

[METHODS] English databases were searched from inception through January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of related therapies for patients with EC stratified by MMR status were included. The main evaluation indicators included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), and severe adverse events (SAEs).

[RESULTS] Ten studies were included in the analysis. The results indicated that in the dMMR population, ICIs provide superior survival benefits. Among these, Dostarlimab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) had the highest PFS and OS rates. For the pMMR population, Selinexor + CP offers significant benefits over CP alone, although OS outcome data are limited. In pMMR patients with prior chemotherapy, the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab strategy may provide additional PFS benefits relative to chemotherapy treatment.

[CONCLUSIONS] ICIs offered advantages for the dMMR population, whereas selinexor could provide survival benefits for the pMMR population. For pMMR patients who have received prior chemotherapy, the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab strategy shows promise.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)