본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Real-World Safety and Early Effectiveness of First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab with Routine Dexamethasone Premedication in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Cancers 2026 Vol.18(5)

Hara T, Wakita N, Tobe T, Ueki H, Okamura Y, Bando Y, Suzuki K, Terakawa T, Hyodo Y, Yao A, Chiba K, Teishima J, Miyake H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has become a first-line standard for metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 추적기간 6.7 months

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Hara T, Wakita N, et al. (2026). Real-World Safety and Early Effectiveness of First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab with Routine Dexamethasone Premedication in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.. Cancers, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050739
MLA Hara T, et al.. "Real-World Safety and Early Effectiveness of First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab with Routine Dexamethasone Premedication in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.." Cancers, vol. 18, no. 5, 2026.
PMID 41827674

Abstract

: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) has become a first-line standard for metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma. However, EVP is associated with distinct toxicities, particularly cutaneous adverse events, and prophylactic systemic corticosteroids were not permitted in pivotal trials. Therefore, the safety and early effectiveness of EVP with routine dexamethasone premedication in real-world practice remain unclear. : This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma who received first-line EVP at five institutions in Japan between September 2024 and September 2025. All patients received routine intravenous dexamethasone premedication before enfortumab vedotin administration. Safety and early clinical outcomes were evaluated, with exploratory subgroup analyses according to clinical trial eligibility and EVITA criteria. : Seventy-seven patients were included, with a median age of 75 years, and more than half would have been ineligible for pivotal clinical trials. Cutaneous toxicity was the most frequent adverse event (52.0%), whereas grade ≥3 skin reactions were uncommon (3.9%). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, the objective response rate was 73.0%. The 6-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 73.9% and 78.7%, respectively. Early progression-free survival was generally maintained across subgroups stratified by clinical trial eligibility and EVITA category, with no evidence of excess early progression. : In this real-world multicenter cohort, first-line EVP with routine dexamethasone premedication was feasible, with manageable toxicity and encouraging early clinical activity, including in patients with comorbidities commonly encountered in routine clinical practice. Longer follow-up and prospective comparative studies are warranted to clarify long-term outcomes and the impact of dexamethasone on efficacy and toxicity.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)