본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

AI Improves Agreement and Reduces Time for Quantifying Metabolic Tumour Burden in Hodgkin Lymphoma.

1/5 보강
Hematology reports 📖 저널 OA 100% 2025: 12/12 OA 2026: 14/14 OA 2025~2026 2025 Vol.17(6)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
12 cases without AI advice, and to use automated AI segmentation in a further 12 cases, with editing as required, i.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The median difference in tMTV between measurements with and without AI was 3.3 cm, corresponding to 2.3% of the median tMTV. [CONCLUSIONS] An automated AI-based tool can significantly increase agreement among specialists quantifying tMTV in HL patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT, without markedly changing the measurements.

Sadik M, Barrington SF, Ulén J, Enqvist O, Trägårdh E, Saboury B

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The aim was to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for the automated quantification of the total metabolic tumour volume (tMTV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sadik M, Barrington SF, et al. (2025). AI Improves Agreement and Reduces Time for Quantifying Metabolic Tumour Burden in Hodgkin Lymphoma.. Hematology reports, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep17060060
MLA Sadik M, et al.. "AI Improves Agreement and Reduces Time for Quantifying Metabolic Tumour Burden in Hodgkin Lymphoma.." Hematology reports, vol. 17, no. 6, 2025.
PMID 41283236 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The aim was to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool for the automated quantification of the total metabolic tumour volume (tMTV) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) could support nuclear medicine specialists in lesion segmentation and thereby enhance inter-observer agreement.

[METHODS] Forty-eight consecutive patients who underwent staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT were included. Eight invited specialists from different hospitals were asked to manually segment lesions for tMTV calculations in 12 cases without AI advice, and to use automated AI segmentation in a further 12 cases, with editing as required, i.e., segmenting/adjusting 24 cases each. Each case was segmented by two specialists manually and by two different specialists using the AI tool, allowing for the pairwise comparison of inter-observer variability.

[RESULTS] The median difference between two specialists performing manual tMTV segmentations was 26 cm (IQR 10-86 cm) corresponding to 23% (IQR 7-50%) of the median tMTV in the dataset, while the median difference between two specialists tMTV adjustments using AI segmentations was 12 cm (IQR 4-39 cm) corresponding to 9% (IQR 2-21%) ( = 0.023). The median difference in tMTV between measurements with and without AI was 3.3 cm, corresponding to 2.3% of the median tMTV.

[CONCLUSIONS] An automated AI-based tool can significantly increase agreement among specialists quantifying tMTV in HL patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT, without markedly changing the measurements.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기