본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Symptom dynamics through multiphase treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.

1/5 보강
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 📖 저널 OA 36.7% 2022: 3/8 OA 2023: 0/4 OA 2024: 3/5 OA 2025: 21/90 OA 2026: 83/192 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.33(12) p. 1151
Retraction 확인
출처

Liu Q, Chen Y, Liu Z, Xue Y, Qi W, Xing X

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To construct symptom network for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients at different stages of treatment, explore the longitudinal relationships among 31 symptoms at different points, ident

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Liu Q, Chen Y, et al. (2025). Symptom dynamics through multiphase treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 33(12), 1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-10220-6
MLA Liu Q, et al.. "Symptom dynamics through multiphase treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.." Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 33, no. 12, 2025, pp. 1151.
PMID 41318732 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To construct symptom network for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients at different stages of treatment, explore the longitudinal relationships among 31 symptoms at different points, identify key causal symptoms, and determine optimal intervention time windows.

[METHODS] AML patients admitted between July 2024 and May 2025 for chemotherapy were enrolled. Symptom incidence was assessed using the Chinese version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS-Ch) at three points: the day before chemotherapy initiation (T1), chemotherapy completion day (T2), and seven days post-chemotherapy (T3).Cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) modeling was applied to analyze longitudinal mechanisms among 31 core symptoms across three critical treatment phases.

[RESULTS] Of 275 enrolled AML patients (mean age = 56.02 ± 13.96 years), fatigue and feeling sad were the most prevalent symptoms across T1, T2, and T3. CLPN analysis identified key cross-lagged paths: difficulty swallowing (S22) → loss of appetite (S20) from T1 → T2 and weight loss (S26) → loss of appetite (S20) from T2 → T3. Predictive analysis showed feeling sad (S16) had the highest out-predictive strength in T1 → T2, while weight loss (S26) had the highest out-predictive strength in T2 → T3. Shortness of breath (S14) exhibited the highest in-predictive strength in T1 → T2, and loss of appetite (S20) had the highest in-predictive strength in T2 → T3. Centrality analysis revealed feeling sad (S16) and mental tension (S5) as the top out-strength nodes in T1 → T2, whereas mouth ulcers (S24) and weight loss (S26) were dominant in T2 → T3.

[CONCLUSIONS] AML symptom management should focus on the dynamic interplay of core symptoms, particularly during T2, providing targeted nutritional and psychological support guided by causal pathways to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. Future models integrating physiological data and treatment plans could enhance symptom prediction and management.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반