본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Assessing PET-CT versus conventional CT: a meta-analysis on diagnostic efficacy, prognosis, and post-surgical wound healing in lung mucosal marginal zone lymphoma.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Frontiers in oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 15/15 OA 2022: 98/98 OA 2023: 60/60 OA 2024: 189/189 OA 2025: 1004/1004 OA 2026: 620/620 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.16() p. 1671661 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

Lin Y, An L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and conventional CT in assessing the clinical pathological features, prognosis,

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 3.17 to 11.02
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Lin Y, An L (2026). Assessing PET-CT versus conventional CT: a meta-analysis on diagnostic efficacy, prognosis, and post-surgical wound healing in lung mucosal marginal zone lymphoma.. Frontiers in oncology, 16, 1671661. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1671661
MLA Lin Y, et al.. "Assessing PET-CT versus conventional CT: a meta-analysis on diagnostic efficacy, prognosis, and post-surgical wound healing in lung mucosal marginal zone lymphoma.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 16, 2026, pp. 1671661.
PMID 41727635 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and conventional CT in assessing the clinical pathological features, prognosis, and post-surgical wound healing in Lung Mucosal Marginal Zone Lymphoma (LMMZL).

[METHODS] Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, culminating in the inclusion of 7 studies representing 353 LMMZL patients. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, and risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data, were used for the meta-analysis, all with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

[RESULTS] PET-CT demonstrated a superior lesion detection rate (LDR) with an SMD of 7.10 (95% CI: 3.17 to 11.02, < 0.01) and cancer staging detection rate (CSDR) with an SMD of 12.35 (95% CI: 8.99 to 15.7, < 0.01), compared to conventional CT. A significant reduction in false positive rate (FPR) was noted for PET-CT, indicated by an SMD of -44.74 (95% CI: -66.36 to -23.11, < 0.01). Additionally, PET-CT was associated with a notable improvement in wound healing outcomes post-surgery, as evidenced by an SMD of -5.93 (95% CI: -8.69 to -3.17, < 0.01).

[CONCLUSION] PET-CT emerges as a potentially superior diagnostic tool over conventional CT in evaluating the clinical features, prognosis, and post-surgical wound healing in LMMZL. These findings indicated the advanced imaging techniques on enhancing surgical precision and patient recovery in future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for LMMZL.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기