CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.
1/5 보강
We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [F]FDG-PET/MRI.
- p-value P=0.023
- p-value P<0.001
- Sensitivity 84.6%
- Specificity 93.7%
APA
Singh SB, Lokesha YU, et al. (2026). CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.. American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 16(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.62347/RSDQ2273
MLA
Singh SB, et al.. "CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.." American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, vol. 16, no. 1, 2026, pp. 55-62.
PMID
41868687 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [F]FDG-PET/MRI. We evaluated CNN's sensitivity, specificity, percentage agreement, and processing time compared to the interpretations of a pediatric radiologist and a second-year radiology resident. In this retrospective study, a CNN was trained on annotated [F]FDG-PET/MRI scans from 53 pediatric lymphoma patients and tested on 30 additional scans. The CNN and two human readers recorded the presence of lesions in five anatomical regions. An additional pediatric radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician determined the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN were compared with those of human readers using the McNemar test, and the detection time of the CNN and human readers was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The CNN demonstrated higher sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (93.7%) than the radiology resident (69.2%, P=0.023; 81.5%, P<0.001), but lower than the pediatric radiologist (98.7%, P<0.001; 99.5%, P<0.001). The CNN achieved 83% agreement with the reference standard (95% CI: 79%-87%), higher than the resident's 63% (95% CI: 59%-69%) but lower than the pediatric radiologist's 94% (95% CI: 92%-97%). The median values and interquartile ranges for the time taken (in minutes) were 4 (3, 5) for the CNN, 8 (7, 10) for the pediatric radiologist, and 15 (9, 20) for the radiology resident. The sensitivity, specificity, and percentage agreement of the CNN were higher than those of a radiology resident but lower than those of a pediatric radiologist. The CNN readout was significantly faster compared to both human readers.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Acquired L858R mutation following -TKI resistance in lung adenocarcinoma: a case report.
- Counting the Cost: Anticipated Financial Burden and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Leukemia and Lymphoma.
- Balancing safety and efficacy of Bendamustine plus anti CD20 regimens in elderly patients (> 70 y) with follicular lymphoma: a tertiary academic center experience.
- Multifocal anaplastic astrocytoma mimicking primary central nervous system lymphoma: A case report.
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Prediction of Secondary Solid Malignancies in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Follicular Lymphoma.
- A novel real-world data methodology for lymphoma outcome classification: the real-world Lugano study.