본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.

1/5 보강
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2026 Vol.16(1) p. 55-62 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

Singh SB, Lokesha YU, Wang H, Barrow MJ, von Kruechten R, Vasyliv I

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [F]FDG-PET/MRI.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P=0.023
  • p-value P<0.001
  • Sensitivity 84.6%
  • Specificity 93.7%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Singh SB, Lokesha YU, et al. (2026). CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.. American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 16(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.62347/RSDQ2273
MLA Singh SB, et al.. "CNN-based detection of pediatric lymphoma on whole body [F]FDG-PET/MRI.." American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, vol. 16, no. 1, 2026, pp. 55-62.
PMID 41868687 ↗
DOI 10.62347/RSDQ2273

Abstract

We assessed the performance of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting pediatric lymphoma lesions on [F]FDG-PET/MRI. We evaluated CNN's sensitivity, specificity, percentage agreement, and processing time compared to the interpretations of a pediatric radiologist and a second-year radiology resident. In this retrospective study, a CNN was trained on annotated [F]FDG-PET/MRI scans from 53 pediatric lymphoma patients and tested on 30 additional scans. The CNN and two human readers recorded the presence of lesions in five anatomical regions. An additional pediatric radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician determined the reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of the CNN were compared with those of human readers using the McNemar test, and the detection time of the CNN and human readers was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The CNN demonstrated higher sensitivity (84.6%) and specificity (93.7%) than the radiology resident (69.2%, P=0.023; 81.5%, P<0.001), but lower than the pediatric radiologist (98.7%, P<0.001; 99.5%, P<0.001). The CNN achieved 83% agreement with the reference standard (95% CI: 79%-87%), higher than the resident's 63% (95% CI: 59%-69%) but lower than the pediatric radiologist's 94% (95% CI: 92%-97%). The median values and interquartile ranges for the time taken (in minutes) were 4 (3, 5) for the CNN, 8 (7, 10) for the pediatric radiologist, and 15 (9, 20) for the radiology resident. The sensitivity, specificity, and percentage agreement of the CNN were higher than those of a radiology resident but lower than those of a pediatric radiologist. The CNN readout was significantly faster compared to both human readers.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기