본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI.

1/5 보강
Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society 📖 저널 OA 95.8% 2022: 1/1 OA 2023: 3/3 OA 2024: 5/5 OA 2025: 35/35 OA 2026: 25/28 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.26(1)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
543 patients with pathologically confirmed GBM ( = 401) or PCNSL ( = 142) were divided into 3 cohorts.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The CE-T1WI radiomics model has the best diagnostic efficacy. [SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-026-01018-8.

Yu F, Yuan J, Lin X, Wang F, Yu L, Yu S, Zhu Y, Song Y, Cao D, Chen J, Xing Z

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] To systematically evaluate and compare the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models derived from noncontrast CT (NCCT) versus multiparametric MRI in differentiating glioblastoma (GBM) from

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yu F, Yuan J, et al. (2026). Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI.. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-026-01018-8
MLA Yu F, et al.. "Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI.." Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026.
PMID 41840692 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] To systematically evaluate and compare the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models derived from noncontrast CT (NCCT) versus multiparametric MRI in differentiating glioblastoma (GBM) from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

[METHODS] In this retrospective, multicenter study, 543 patients with pathologically confirmed GBM ( = 401) or PCNSL ( = 142) were divided into 3 cohorts. 1084 quantitative features were extracted from contrast-enhancing (CE) and non-enhancing (NE) regions across NCCT and five MRI sequences (T2WI, T1WI, ADC, FLAIR, and CE-T1WI). Feature selection employed ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and recursive feature elimination, followed by nested cross-validation (5-fold outer, 3-fold inner) to construct four machine learning classifiers: support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and decision tree. Model performance was rigorously assessed through AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity with bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis was employed to explore the interpretability of models.

[RESULTS] The CE-T1WI radiomics model demonstrated superior diagnostic capability, with its AUCs of train/internal test/external test in CE regions and NE regions were 0.962/0.963/0.907 and 0.966/0.892/0.867, respectively. Notably, the CT-based model was not significantly different from other MRI models except for CE-T1WI model. The AUCs of train/internal test/external test for CT model in CE and NE regions were 0.941/0.906/0.822 and 0.902/0.891 /0.782, respectively.

[CONCLUSIONS] Both NCCT and multiparametric MRI are valuable in identifying GBM and PCNSL. The CE-T1WI radiomics model has the best diagnostic efficacy.

[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-026-01018-8.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기