본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

CD22-targeted immunotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progressing following CD19-targeted immunotherapy.

2/5 보강
NPJ precision oncology 📖 저널 OA 91.2% 2023: 1/1 OA 2024: 6/6 OA 2025: 82/82 OA 2026: 77/93 OA 2023~2026 2026 OA CAR-T cell therapy research
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-30

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
22 patients achieving CR/CRi, 13 (59.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
CD19-targeted therapy at two centers in China
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Patients with extramedullary disease had worse remission rates, and those previously resistant to CD19-targeted therapy had shorter RFS. CD22-targeted therapies offer a potential option for patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy, but high relapse rates highlight the need for better strategies for lasting remission.
OpenAlex 토픽 · CAR-T cell therapy research Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Song F, Yang J, Zhang M, Fu S, Feng J, Hong R, Lu Y, Chang AH, Zhang X, Huang H, Hu Y, Wei G

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in r/r B-ALL experience poor outcomes.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Fengmei Song, Junfang Yang, et al. (2026). CD22-targeted immunotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progressing following CD19-targeted immunotherapy.. NPJ precision oncology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01413-1
MLA Fengmei Song, et al.. "CD22-targeted immunotherapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia progressing following CD19-targeted immunotherapy.." NPJ precision oncology, 2026.
PMID 41963478 ↗

Abstract

Patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in r/r B-ALL experience poor outcomes. CD22-targeted therapies, including CD22 CAR-T cells and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin, show promise as alternatives, although data in those patients is limited. This study retrospectively analyzed 43 r/r B-ALL patients who had previously received CD19-targeted therapy at two centers in China. Among these patients, 27.9% received blinatumomab, 58.1% received CD19 CAR-T cells, and 14% received both. After CD19-targeted therapy, 34.9% of patients experienced CD19-negative relapse, while the remaining patients maintained CD19 expression. Subsequent treatments included CD22 CAR-T cells (55.8%) and InO (44.2%). The median age was 39 (24-56) years, with an overall CR/CRi rate of 54% and 35.1% achieving MRD negativity. Among the 22 patients achieving CR/CRi, 13 (59.1%) experienced relapse. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 236 days (95% CI: 132-unreached), and the median OS has not been reached. Multivariate analysis showed similar remission rates and survival for CD22 CAR-T and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin therapies. Patients with extramedullary disease had worse remission rates, and those previously resistant to CD19-targeted therapy had shorter RFS. CD22-targeted therapies offer a potential option for patients progressing after CD19-targeted immunotherapy, but high relapse rates highlight the need for better strategies for lasting remission.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🔓 OA PDF 열기