본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease.

American journal of ophthalmology 2026

Hao Z, He W

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To characterize clinicopathologic and imaging differences between ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) and IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) and to evalu

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 287
  • 연구 설계 cross-sectional

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Hao Z, He W (2026). Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease.. American journal of ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2026.04.004
MLA Hao Z, et al.. "Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease.." American journal of ophthalmology, 2026.
PMID 41985855

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To characterize clinicopathologic and imaging differences between ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (OAML) and IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) and to evaluate clinical and artificial intelligence-assisted approaches for differentiating these entities.

[DESIGN] Retrospective, single-center observational cross-sectional study.

[PARTICIPANTS] Four hundred patients with pathologically confirmed orbital lymphoproliferative disease, including OAML (n = 287) and IgG4-ROD (n = 113), treated at West China Hospital between 2010 and 2024.

[METHODS] Clinical, serologic, imaging, histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features were systematically compared between groups. A multivariable logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables was developed for early differentiation. Artificial intelligence models were additionally trained using radiological CT/MRI images and digital pathology whole-slide images.

[MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES] Distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics between OAML and IgG4-ROD and diagnostic discrimination assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

[RESULTS] OAML more frequently presented as unilateral orbital or conjunctival lesions and showed monoclonal features, including light-chain restriction and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. In contrast, IgG4-ROD predominantly involved bilateral lacrimal glands and demonstrated fibro-inflammatory changes with abundant IgG4⁺ plasma cells. Serum IgG4 levels overlapped substantially between groups. The clinical model achieved an AUC of 0.865. Radiology- and pathology-based artificial intelligence models achieved AUCs of 0.933 and 0.946, respectively, and pathology-informed radiology training further improved discrimination (AUC 0.974).

[CONCLUSIONS] Integrated clinical, imaging, and pathologic assessment provides practical distinctions between OAML and IgG4-ROD. Artificial intelligence-assisted imaging analysis may complement conventional diagnostic pathways and support differentiation in clinically ambiguous orbital lymphoproliferative disease.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)