본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Metabolic tumor burden as a prognostic indicator after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

1/5 보강
International journal of surgery (London, England) 📖 저널 OA 57.1% 2021: 0/3 OA 2022: 0/6 OA 2023: 9/9 OA 2024: 53/53 OA 2025: 129/222 OA 2026: 127/242 OA 2021~2026 2024 Vol.110(7) p. 4074-4082
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
34 patients, respectively (mean NAT cycles, 8.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
surgery after NAT for BRPC and LAPC between 2017 and 2021 were identified
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Elevated MTV is an influential prognostic factor for worse survival, regardless of post-NAT CA19-9 levels. These results could be helpful in identifying patients with a poor prognosis despite normalization of CA19-9 levels after NAT.

Lee W, Oh M, Kim JS, Sung M, Hong K, Kwak BJ, Park Y, Jun E, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Yoo C, Kim KP, Park I, Jeong JH, Chang HM, Ryoo BY, Lee JB, Kim SC

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] There is no standardized assessment for evaluating response although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) is widely accepted for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BRP

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P <0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Lee W, Oh M, et al. (2024). Metabolic tumor burden as a prognostic indicator after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 110(7), 4074-4082. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001389
MLA Lee W, et al.. "Metabolic tumor burden as a prognostic indicator after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 110, no. 7, 2024, pp. 4074-4082.
PMID 38537071 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] There is no standardized assessment for evaluating response although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) is widely accepted for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BRPC or LAPC). This study was aimed to evaluate NAT response using positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT) parameters alongside carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels.

[METHODS] Patients who underwent surgery after NAT for BRPC and LAPC between 2017 and 2021 were identified. The study assessed the prognostic value of PET-derived parameters after NAT, determining cutoff values using the K-adaptive partitioning method. It created four groups based on the elevation or normalization of PET parameters and CA19-9 levels, comparing survival between these groups.

[RESULTS] Of 200 eligible patients, FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based NAT was administered in 166 and 34 patients, respectively (mean NAT cycles, 8.3). In a multivariate analysis, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) demonstrated the most robust performance in assessing response [hazard ratio (HR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-5.58, P <0.001] based on cutoff value of 2.4. Patients with decreased MTV had significantly better survival than those with elevated MTV among individuals with CA19-9 levels less than 37 IU/l (median survival; 35.5 vs. 20.9 months, P <0.001) and CA19-9 levels at least 37 IU/l (median survival; 34.3 vs. 17.8 months, P =0.03). In patients suspected to be Lewis antigen negative, the predictive performance of MTV was found to be limited ( P =0.84).

[CONCLUSION] Elevated MTV is an influential prognostic factor for worse survival, regardless of post-NAT CA19-9 levels. These results could be helpful in identifying patients with a poor prognosis despite normalization of CA19-9 levels after NAT.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기