본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Performance of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET imaging for pancreatic neoplasms assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
European radiology 📖 저널 OA 35.5% 2022: 1/4 OA 2023: 0/7 OA 2024: 2/11 OA 2025: 18/71 OA 2026: 73/165 OA 2022~2026 2024 Vol.34(12) p. 7804-7812
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: pancreatic cancer
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Multiple radiolabeled FAPI variants have shown promising results in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. FAPI PET imaging effectively helps clinicians diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer.

Tang R, Liu M, Shu Q, Chen X, Cai L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Recent studies have shown the potential of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging for pancreatic cancer assessment.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.999-1.000

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Tang R, Liu M, et al. (2024). Performance of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET imaging for pancreatic neoplasms assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. European radiology, 34(12), 7804-7812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10843-z
MLA Tang R, et al.. "Performance of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET imaging for pancreatic neoplasms assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.." European radiology, vol. 34, no. 12, 2024, pp. 7804-7812.
PMID 38907099 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Recent studies have shown the potential of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging for pancreatic cancer assessment.

[PURPOSE] This article is dedicated to comparing the diagnostic efficacy of FAPI PET and [F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the evaluation of primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases in pancreatic cancer.

[METHODS] In this review, we conducted a systematic search of studies published in PubMed and Web of Science databases up to September 18, 2023. All included studies used radionuclide labeled FAPI and FDG as PET diagnostic tracers to evaluate their applicability in patients with pancreatic cancer.

[RESULTS] The FAPI PET imaging group showed significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions (1.000, [95% CI: 0.999-1.000]), lymph node metastases (0.624 [95% CI: 0.391-0.834]) and distant metastatic (0.965 [95% CI: 0.804-1.000]) in pancreatic cancer compared to the FDG PET imaging group (0.889 [95% CI: 0.788-0.966], 0.373 [95% CI: 0.163-0.606] and 0.889 [95% CI: 0.689-0.999], respectively). Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FAPI PET imaging is significantly higher than that in FDG imaging for primary lesions (mean difference (MD) = 7.51, 95% CI: 5.34-9.67).

[CONCLUSION] Compared with [F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI PET imaging showed higher sensitivity, SUVmax. This method can be effectively utilized for the evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

[CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT] Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET may be a better alternative to [F]FDG in evaluating primary pancreatic cancer, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases.

[KEY POINTS] Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET is compared with FDG PET for evaluating pancreatic cancer. Multiple radiolabeled FAPI variants have shown promising results in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. FAPI PET imaging effectively helps clinicians diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반