Effect of Radiotherapy in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis and bad curative effect.
- 95% CI 0.58-0.91
- HR 0.72
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Tang P, Zhang J, et al. (2025). Effect of Radiotherapy in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Pancreas, 54(3), e246-e254. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002400
MLA
Tang P, et al.. "Effect of Radiotherapy in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.." Pancreas, vol. 54, no. 3, 2025, pp. e246-e254.
PMID
39999316
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Pancreatic cancer is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis and bad curative effect. Previous studies did not confirm the role of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). By reviewing new findings reported in recent years, we conducted this study to evaluate the survival impact by comparing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with chemotherapy alone.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients with BRPC or LAPC treated with neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) and R0 resection rate.
[RESULTS] A total of 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91, I2 = 61.7%) and PFS/DFS/RFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91, I2 = 52.3%) are both favored CRT. Although R0 resection rate was increased in CRT group, significant survival benefit of radiotherapy was found in LAPC and low resection rate subgroup in stratification analysis. Regression analysis showed that only tumor resectability was associated with OS.
[CONCLUSIONS] For patients with LAPC and who are unlikely to receive resection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy seems to improve OS and PFS/DFS/RFS.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients with BRPC or LAPC treated with neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) and R0 resection rate.
[RESULTS] A total of 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91, I2 = 61.7%) and PFS/DFS/RFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91, I2 = 52.3%) are both favored CRT. Although R0 resection rate was increased in CRT group, significant survival benefit of radiotherapy was found in LAPC and low resection rate subgroup in stratification analysis. Regression analysis showed that only tumor resectability was associated with OS.
[CONCLUSIONS] For patients with LAPC and who are unlikely to receive resection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy seems to improve OS and PFS/DFS/RFS.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pancreatectomy; Treatment Outcome; Progression-Free Survival; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- The Role of Patient Education in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
- ZNF454-FSTL3 axis inhibits colorectal cancer progression by inhibiting HIF-1α-mediated glycolysis in hypoxia.
- Delayed complications from polyacrylamide gel breast fillers: a case report.
- Experience with the safe admission of breast and thyroid cancer patients in non-endemic areas during an epidemic outbreak.
- Targeting NOX4 disrupts the resistance of papillary thyroid carcinoma to chemotherapeutic drugs and lenvatinib.