본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Artificial Intelligence in CT for Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Academic radiology 📖 저널 OA 5.8% 2023: 1/1 OA 2024: 1/8 OA 2025: 4/67 OA 2026: 3/79 OA 2023~2026 2025 Vol.32(5) p. 2554-2568
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1778 patients in internal validation sets and 4072 patients in external validation sets were included.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
AI could potentially serve as a valuable diagnostic support tool, though further prospective validation is warranted. Limitations include high heterogeneity among studies and insufficient external validation in diverse populations.

Zeng S, Liu Y, Duan X, Zhao X, Sun X, Zhang F

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-based artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P<0.05
  • 95% CI 0.71-0.86
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Zeng S, Liu Y, et al. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in CT for Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis.. Academic radiology, 32(5), 2554-2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.007
MLA Zeng S, et al.. "Artificial Intelligence in CT for Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis.." Academic radiology, vol. 32, no. 5, 2025, pp. 2554-2568.
PMID 40000328 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-based artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

[METHODS] A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through December 2024, following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Studies evaluating CT-based AI models for diagnosing cervical LNM in patients with pathologically confirmed PTC were included. The methodological quality was assessed using a modified QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was evaluated using I statistics, and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

[RESULTS] 17 studies comprising 1778 patients in internal validation sets and 4072 patients in external validation sets were included. In internal validation sets, AI demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), and AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89). Radiologists suggested comparable performance with sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87), specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.85), and AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.88). Subgroup analyses revealed that deep learning methods outperformed machine learning in sensitivity (0.86 vs 0.72, P<0.05). No significant publication bias was found in internal validation sets for AI diagnosis (P=0.78).

[CONCLUSION] CT-based AI showed comparable diagnostic performance to radiologists for detecting cervical LNM in PTC patients, with deep learning models showing superior sensitivity. AI could potentially serve as a valuable diagnostic support tool, though further prospective validation is warranted. Limitations include high heterogeneity among studies and insufficient external validation in diverse populations.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반