본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The diagnostic performance and reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting system in the evaluation of local recurrence in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

1/5 보강
Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 2025 Vol.66(9) p. 947-954
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
110 patients who have biochemically recurrent PCa after RT (n = 35) or RP (n = 75) were included in this retrospective study.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
mpMRI, PSMA-PET/CT, and biopsy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Liu X, Yang S, Deng W, Li D, Shen J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

BackgroundThe multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system has been proposed to evaluate local recurrence in patients with prostate

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 35

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liu X, Yang S, et al. (2025). The diagnostic performance and reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting system in the evaluation of local recurrence in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 66(9), 947-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251334364
MLA Liu X, et al.. "The diagnostic performance and reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting system in the evaluation of local recurrence in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.." Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), vol. 66, no. 9, 2025, pp. 947-954.
PMID 40267329

Abstract

BackgroundThe multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system has been proposed to evaluate local recurrence in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who have been treated with radiation therapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP).PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the PI-RR system in the diagnosis of locally recurrent PCa remains.Material and MethodsA total of 110 patients who have biochemically recurrent PCa after RT (n = 35) or RP (n = 75) were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent mpMRI, PSMA-PET/CT, and biopsy. Four radiologists with varying levels of expertise independently assessed the local recurrence of PCa using PI-RR. The reference standard was the biopsy pathology. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of PI-RR and PSMA-PET/CT, and areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated. Interreader agreement across four readers was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsAmong 110 patients with biochemically recurrent PCa, 28 had local recurrence and 82 had no local recurrence. Using a cutoff of 4, the AUCs of PI-RR in the diagnosis of local recurrence were in the range of 0.61-0.84 in patients treated with RT and 0.71-0.89 in patients treated with RP. The ICC was 0.86 (95% confidence interval = 0.81-0.91).ConclusionPI-RR using a cutoff of 4 has a favorable diagnostic performance and interreader agreement, which might be alternatively used for detecting local recurrence in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa treated with RT or RP.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Observer Variation; Reproducibility of Results; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)