Neoadjuvant Antiandrogen Therapy With or Without MEK or SRC Inhibition for Unfavorable-risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
45 patients undergoing prostatectomy for International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml, and/or stage ≥cT3a localized prostate adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 6-8 wk of neoadjuvant ADT (enzalutamide + degarelix) alone or in combination with either an SRC inhibitor (dasatinib) or MEK inhibitor (trametinib).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
No patients experienced a grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event. [CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] Neoadjuvant SRC or MEK inhibition does not appear to mitigate the EMT response to ADT or influence clinical or pathological outcomes.
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] It is thought that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) resistance and subsequent prostate cancer progression via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is induced by the SRC
APA
Agrawal R, Weiner AB, et al. (2025). Neoadjuvant Antiandrogen Therapy With or Without MEK or SRC Inhibition for Unfavorable-risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.. European urology oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.10.013
MLA
Agrawal R, et al.. "Neoadjuvant Antiandrogen Therapy With or Without MEK or SRC Inhibition for Unfavorable-risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.." European urology oncology, 2025.
PMID
41207813 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] It is thought that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) resistance and subsequent prostate cancer progression via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is induced by the SRC and MEK pathways. We hypothesized that inhibition of these pathways could reduce EMT.
[METHODS] In this phase 2 trial, 45 patients undergoing prostatectomy for International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml, and/or stage ≥cT3a localized prostate adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 6-8 wk of neoadjuvant ADT (enzalutamide + degarelix) alone or in combination with either an SRC inhibitor (dasatinib) or MEK inhibitor (trametinib). The primary endpoint was the abundance of EMT markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) on immunohistochemistry (IHC) after prostatectomy. Secondary outcomes included clinicopathologic outcomes, changes in EMT markers between biopsy and prostatectomy according to IHC and RNA abundance, and safety.
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] IHC results for N-cadherin and vimentin after treatment did not differ by arm. No differences were observed in time to biochemical recurrence, time to testosterone recovery, or pathologic minimal residual disease. MAP2K1, MAP2K2, and SRC RNA abundance decreased significantly in all three arms. No patients experienced a grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] Neoadjuvant SRC or MEK inhibition does not appear to mitigate the EMT response to ADT or influence clinical or pathological outcomes.
[METHODS] In this phase 2 trial, 45 patients undergoing prostatectomy for International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥3, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml, and/or stage ≥cT3a localized prostate adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 6-8 wk of neoadjuvant ADT (enzalutamide + degarelix) alone or in combination with either an SRC inhibitor (dasatinib) or MEK inhibitor (trametinib). The primary endpoint was the abundance of EMT markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) on immunohistochemistry (IHC) after prostatectomy. Secondary outcomes included clinicopathologic outcomes, changes in EMT markers between biopsy and prostatectomy according to IHC and RNA abundance, and safety.
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] IHC results for N-cadherin and vimentin after treatment did not differ by arm. No differences were observed in time to biochemical recurrence, time to testosterone recovery, or pathologic minimal residual disease. MAP2K1, MAP2K2, and SRC RNA abundance decreased significantly in all three arms. No patients experienced a grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] Neoadjuvant SRC or MEK inhibition does not appear to mitigate the EMT response to ADT or influence clinical or pathological outcomes.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.