본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Versus Conventional Imaging for Preoperative Staging High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery for cN0M0 Disease: An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.

1/5 보강
European urology oncology 2025
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
0 patients at PSMA-PET versus cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (p < 0.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] Time to biochemical recurrence was longer in the miN0M0 cohort than in the cN0M0 cohort. Superior PSMA-PET staging accuracy seems to improve short-term oncologic outcomes of high-risk PCa patients following surgery.

Bianchi L, Droghetti M, Catanzaro C, Valerio M, Novello Q, Mari A, Campi R, Nicoletti R, Heidegger I, Giannini G, Zattoni F, Reitano G, Bauckneht M, Lanfranchi F, Rajwa P, Marra G, Soeterik T, den Bergh RV, Fendler WP, Darr C, Rivas JG, Kesch C, Mignogna C, Gandaglia G, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Gontero P, Fanti S, Masieri L, Serni S, Minervini A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Schiavina R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Current guidelines strongly recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for staging high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • p-value p = 0.003

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Bianchi L, Droghetti M, et al. (2025). Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Versus Conventional Imaging for Preoperative Staging High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery for cN0M0 Disease: An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.. European urology oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.11.011
MLA Bianchi L, et al.. "Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Versus Conventional Imaging for Preoperative Staging High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery for cN0M0 Disease: An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.." European urology oncology, 2025.
PMID 41353037

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Current guidelines strongly recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for staging high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of staging procedure (PSMA-PET vs conventional imaging) on short-term oncologic outcomes in a cohort of N0M0 high-risk PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).

[METHODS] We retrospectively included 1475 high-risk PCa patients who underwent RP and ePLND in 14 referral centers between 2014 and 2024. Each patient underwent either PSMA-PET (miN0M0) or conventional imaging (cN0M0). After a landmark analysis and 1:1 propensity score matching for age at diagnosis, year of surgery, initial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), cT stage, and International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at biopsy, the Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to assess biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCR-FS) and multivariable Cox regression models to identify the predictors of BCR (time in months between the date of RP and the date of BCR).

[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] After propensity score matching, 463 (48.2%) versus 463 (90.1%) patients underwent PSMA-PET versus conventional imaging. PSA persistence was observed in 15 (3.2%) versus 64 (14%) miN0M0 patients at PSMA-PET versus cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (p < 0.001). The BCR-FS rates at 36 mo were 90.9% and 82.2% in the PSMA-PET and conventional imaging cohorts, respectively. At multivariate Cox regression analyses, PSMA-PET (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.77) was an independent predictor of lower BCR rates (p = 0.003). In the PSMA-PET cohort, BCR-FS rates were similar between patients with one high-risk feature and those with two or more high-risk features, while in the conventional imaging cohort, two or more high-risk features were associated with significantly worse BCR-FS rates than one high-risk feature. Limitations include the retrospective design of the study.

[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] Time to biochemical recurrence was longer in the miN0M0 cohort than in the cN0M0 cohort. Superior PSMA-PET staging accuracy seems to improve short-term oncologic outcomes of high-risk PCa patients following surgery.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)