본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Avoiding unnecessary biopsy in suspicious prostate cancer using PRIMARY score ≤3 and PSAD ≤0.2 ng/mL/cm3: a real-world, dual-center study from China.

International journal of surgery (London, England) 2026 Vol.112(4) p. 9237-45

He J, Qi L, Chen M, Hu S, Gao X, Tang Y, Chen S, Cai Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Among Chinese men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-20 ng/mL scheduled for biopsy, <20% harbor clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, International Society of Urological Path

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 243
  • p-value P = 0.002
  • p-value P < 0.0001
  • Sensitivity 90.9%

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA He J, Qi L, et al. (2026). Avoiding unnecessary biopsy in suspicious prostate cancer using PRIMARY score ≤3 and PSAD ≤0.2 ng/mL/cm3: a real-world, dual-center study from China.. International journal of surgery (London, England), 112(4), 9237-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000004733
MLA He J, et al.. "Avoiding unnecessary biopsy in suspicious prostate cancer using PRIMARY score ≤3 and PSAD ≤0.2 ng/mL/cm3: a real-world, dual-center study from China.." International journal of surgery (London, England), vol. 112, no. 4, 2026, pp. 9237-45.
PMID 41524086

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Among Chinese men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-20 ng/mL scheduled for biopsy, <20% harbor clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] ≥2); most procedures target non-clinically significant prostate cancer (non-csPCa; ISUP <2) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We tested whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) combined with multiparametric imaging and laboratory assays can accurately identify non-csPCa/BPH and safely reduce unnecessary biopsies.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We retrospectively enrolled patients from two centers. In the discovery cohort, participants underwent PSA testing, mpMRI, and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, and were assessed for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and PRIMARY scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and diagnostic tests compared the efficacy of each indicator for non-csPCa/BPH and established the optimal strategy. The validation cohort independently verified this strategy.

[RESULTS] Discovery cohort (n = 243): PRIMARY score area under the curve (AUC) 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.95); cutoff ≤3 provided 83.5% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity, outperforming PI-RADS (P = 0.002), PSA density (PSAD), free/total PSA (f/tPSA), and total PSA (tPSA) (all P < 0.0001). Combined models: PRIMARY score + PI-RADS AUC 0.95 (0.92-0.97); PRIMARY + PSAD or + f/tPSA both 0.94. A strategy of PRIMARY score ≤3 plus PSAD ≤0.2 achieved 100% specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for csPCa, sparing 54.1% of unnecessary biopsies with zero csPCa missed - superior to European Association of Urology (EAU)-recommended PI-RADS ≤2 + PSAD ≤0.2 (sensitivity 19.6%). External cohort (n = 149) validated 100% specificity/PPV, avoiding 69.6% of biopsies while maintaining 0% csPCa miss rate.

[CONCLUSIONS] In men with suspected prostate cancer (PSA 4-20 ng/mL or abnormal digital rectal examination), the combined criterion of PRIMARY score ≤3 and PSAD ≤0.2 ng/mL/cm3 enabled pre-biopsy triage that safely avoided immediate diagnostic biopsy in more than 50% of patients ultimately found to harbor non-csPCa and BPH in our cohorts, while ensuring that no csPCa was missed. These findings require confirmation in larger prospective, multicenter studies before routine clinical implementation.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)