본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Synthetic Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: Impact of Fixation Shell.

1/5 보강
International journal of particle therapy 2026 Vol.19() p. 101298 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: prostate cancer underwent same-day planning CT (pCT) and MRI
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
same-day planning CT (pCT) and MRI
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Organs at risk (OAR) dose differences were clinically negligible. [CONCLUSIONS] With bone SPR adjustment and fixation-shell consideration, Magnetic Resonance for Calculating ATtenuation-based sCT provides clinically acceptable dose-calculation accuracy for prostate CIRT, supporting the feasibility of MR-only planning.

Ishizawa M, Haga K, Sato H, Miyasaka Y, Souda H, Chai H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft-tissue contrast for prostate delineation, and MR-only radiotherapy eliminates computed tomography (CT)-MRI registration errors.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ishizawa M, Haga K, et al. (2026). Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Synthetic Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: Impact of Fixation Shell.. International journal of particle therapy, 19, 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpt.2026.101298
MLA Ishizawa M, et al.. "Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Synthetic Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: Impact of Fixation Shell.." International journal of particle therapy, vol. 19, 2026, pp. 101298.
PMID 41631158 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft-tissue contrast for prostate delineation, and MR-only radiotherapy eliminates computed tomography (CT)-MRI registration errors. Although synthetic CT (sCT) has been validated for photon and proton therapy, its clinical feasibility in carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) remains unclear, particularly because dose accuracy in CIRT is highly sensitive to stopping-power ratio (SPR) errors. This study evaluated the dosimetric accuracy of MRI-derived sCT for prostate CIRT, including the effect of a thermoplastic fixation shell used clinically but not visualized on MRI.

[METHODS] Twenty patients with prostate cancer underwent same-day planning CT (pCT) and MRI. sCT images were generated using the MRCAT algorithm (Philips Healthcare). Bone pseudo-Hounsfield units were replaced with institution-specific SPR values to improve range accuracy. Treatment plans were created on the pCT and recalculated on the sCT using identical beam parameters. Dose agreement was assessed using carbon-ion depth and lateral dose profiles, 3D gamma analysis (3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm, 1%/1 mm), and key Dose-volume histogram indices. To evaluate the fixation-shell impact, a 3-mm virtual shell was added to the sCT and compared with a corresponding pCT containing the physical shell.

[RESULTS] The sCT-based distal range was longer than that of the pCT by 2.7 ± 1.6 mm, reduced to 1.2 ± 1.6 mm with shell inclusion. Lateral dose differences were <1 mm for all patients. Gamma passing rates exceeded 90% for 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm criteria, and the 1%/1 mm pass rate at the 50% threshold improved by ∼6% with shell inclusion. CTV D99% and PTV D1% agreed within ±1%, whereas PTV D95% decreased by up to 8% at the target periphery. Organs at risk (OAR) dose differences were clinically negligible.

[CONCLUSIONS] With bone SPR adjustment and fixation-shell consideration, Magnetic Resonance for Calculating ATtenuation-based sCT provides clinically acceptable dose-calculation accuracy for prostate CIRT, supporting the feasibility of MR-only planning.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기